# Method Sets Cited

Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of method sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of method sets being developed, finalised and implemented across the institution including clear guidelines and explanations.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of method sets access and cited across the institution including clear guidelines and explanations.

Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of methods sets accessed and cited across the institution and upload the relevant evidence.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting, and understanding any ethical queries with the recording of the number of method sets being developed and finalised.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting and understanding any ethical queries with the recording of the number of methods sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Provide expertise and support in development and management of method sets.

Ensure there is an appropriate and easily accessible database or repository to record method sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure researchers know that they should record all method sets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of methods sets being developed and utilised to them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and that there is a clear link to research assessment.

Train researchers in where and how to log the number of methods sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Train researchers in the development of method sets.

Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of method sets that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of data management plans being developed, finalised and implemented including clear guidelines and explanations.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting and understanding any ethical queries with that arise from monitoring the number of data management plans developed, finalised and implemented across the institution.

Provide expertise and support in the development of quality data management plans.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of them as individuals and the institution of recording the number of data management plan, that they trust the process and that there is a link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in development of quality data management plans.

Ensure there are best practice examples of data management plans that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of FAIR data management plans being developed, finalised and archived across the institution with clear guidelines and expectations.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution with clear guidelines and expectations.

Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries that arise for the number of data management plans being developed, finalised, and archived across the institution.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries that arise for the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution.

Provide expertise and support in the development of FAIR data management plans.

Ensure there is an suitable and easily accessible database or repository to record the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of FAIR data management plans accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of FAIR data plans in these ways and that they understand the benefit to them as individuals and the institution, that the trust the process and the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in where and how to record the number of FAIR data management plans developed accessed and cited.

Train researchers in the development of FAIR data management plans.

Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of FAIR data management plans that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted across the institution, with clear guidelines and expectations.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for collecting the number of peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted.

Provide expertise and support in the development of peer reviews

Ensure researchers understand the benefit to them as individuals and to the institution of collecting the number of peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted that the trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in the peer review process.

Ensure there are best practice examples of peer reviews that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of software sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of software sets being developed, finalised and archived across the institution with clear guidelines and explanation.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of software sets accessed and cited across the institution with clear guidelines and explanation.

Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record and upload the relevant evidence for the number of software sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for recording the number of software sets developing, finalised and archived.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understand any ethical queries with recording the number of software sets accessed and cited.

Provide expertise and support in the development of software sets.

Ensure that there is an appropriate database to record the number of software sets accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure researchers know that that they should record all software sets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit to them as individuals and to the institution of recording the number of software sets utilised, that the trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in where and how to record software sets cited and accessed.

Train researchers in development of software sets.

Ensure there are best practice examples of software sets that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of software set peer reviews that are being drafted, submitted and accepted including guidelines and explanation

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for the recording the number of software set peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted.

Provide expertise and support in the development of software set peer reviews

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of software sets peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted to them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in the software set peer review process.

Ensure there are best practice examples of software peer reviews that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of publications accessed and cited across the institution.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of publications being drafted submitted and published across the institution with clear guidelines and explanation.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of publications accessed and cited across the institution with clear guidelines and explanation.

Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of publications, accessed and cited across the institution and upload the relevant evidence.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for collecting the number of publications being drafted, submitted, and published across the institution.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries with collecting the number of publications accessed and cited across the institution.

Provide expertise and support in quality publications.

Ensure that there is an appropriate and easily accessible database or repository to record the number of publications accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure researchers know that that they should record all publications accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of publications to both individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in where and how to record publications cited and accessed.

Train researchers in how to publish.

Ensure that there are best practice examples of a range of quality publications that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of publication peer reviews being drafted, submitted, and accepted, with clear guidelines and expectations.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for recording, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for recording the number of publication peer reviews being drafted, submitted, and accepted.

Provide expertise and support in the development of publication peer reviews.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording publication peer reviews to them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in the publication peer review process.

Ensure there are best practice examples of publication peer reviews that researchers can access and draw upon.

Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of materials accessed and cited across the institution.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of materials being developed, finalised, and implemented across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of materials accessed and cited across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of materials being developed, accessed, and cited across the institution and upload the relevant evidence.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for recording the number of materials developing, finalised and implemented across the institution.

Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical queries for recording the number of materials accessed and cited across the institution.

Provide expertise and support in materials development.

Ensure that there is an appropriate and easily accessible database to record the number of materials accessed and cited across the institution.

Ensure researchers know that that they should record all materials accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of materials being developed, finalised and implemented to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

Train researchers in where and how to record materials cited and accessed.

Train researchers in materials development.

Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of quality materials that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect information on the number of resources accessed and cited.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect information on the number of resources being developed, finalised, and implemented with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect information on the number of resources accessed and cited with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of resources accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical issues for the collection of the number of resources being developed, finalised, and implemented across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical issues for the collection of the number of resources accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and support in resource development.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate and easily accessible database or repository to record the number of resources accessed and cited across the institution

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record all resources that have been accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit of recording the number of resources being developed, finalised and implemented to both themselves as individuals, that they trust the process and understand the institution and the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in resource development.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of resources developed that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect number of students passed in relevant courses across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of course hours assigned and taught across the institution with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of students that have passed these courses with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers or others time (and supporting budget) to record the number of students that have passed these courses across the institution and upload relevant evidence.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical issues for the collection of the number of course hours assigned and taught across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring, assisting with and understanding any ethical issues for the recording of the number of students that have passed these courses across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and support in teaching.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate and easily accessible method or database for recording the number of students that achieve a pass in relevant courses.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record number of students who achieve a pass in relevant courses taught.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefits to them as individuals and the institution of recording this data on course hours assigned, taught and student pass rates and that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of students who achieve a pass in relevant courses taught.

·       Train researchers in teaching methods.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice courses available that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of student theses of those supervised and number of students graduated across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of students that researchers are currently supervising or have supervised including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of students who publish a theses or graduate with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time to record the number of students theses and the number of students graduated across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of students that are currently or have been supervised.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the recording number of students graduated and theses.

·       Provide expertise and support in supervision.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate method or database for recording the number of students that have completed their theses and graduated.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and monitor the number of students they have supervised who have completed their thesis or graduated.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefits to them as individuals and the institution of recording this data on students they are or have supervised and the resulting number who have produced a theses or graduated that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of students they have supervised who have completed their thesis or graduated.

·       Train researchers in supervision.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in supervision.

·       Try to find best practice examples of supervision that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of information on the number of courses researchers are following, have completed and obtained including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of skills courses researchers are following, have completed and obtained across the institution.

·       Provide a comprehensive programme of skills courses for researchers

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about skills courses, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the programme of skills courses for researchers that are offered by the institution.

·       Ensure there is clear advice and guidance on attending skills courses with a clear link to career development and academic success.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of projects that a researcher is managing, has completed and that have been successfully evaluated including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of projects that a researcher is managing, has completed and that have been successfully evaluated.

·       Provide expertise and support in project management.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about project management, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in project management.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in project management.

·       Try to find best practice examples of project managment that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of agreed outputs and outcomes for the unit across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of unit management positions assigned and completed by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of agreed outputs and outcomes for the unit across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of agreed outputs and outcomes from units across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of unit positions assigned and that have completed.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of agreed outputs and outcomes from units.

·       Provide expertise and support in Unit (team or department) management.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of agreed outputs and outcomes for units.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of agreed outputs and outcomes for units and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about unit management, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of agreed outputs and outcomes for units.

·       Train researchers in unit (team or department) management

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in Unit Management.

·       Try to find best practice examples of Unit Managment that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of expert position outputs, outcomes and achievement awards across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of expert positions assigned and completed by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of expert position outputs, outcomes and achievement awards for the unit across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of expert positions outputs, outcomes, and achievement awards across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of expert positions assigned and that have completed.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of expert positions outputs, outcomes and achievement awards.

·       Provide expertise and supporting in achieving expert positions.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of expert positions outputs, outcomes and achievement awards.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of expert positions outputs, outcomes and achievement awards where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about expert positions, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of expert positions outputs, outcomes and achievements awards.

·       Train researchers in how to find expert position opportunities.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in expert positions.

·       Provide best practice examples and case studies of expert positions that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of intersectoral engagements and outputs by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of intersectoral collaborations and outputs across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged with across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and supporting in intersectoral collaborations.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged with across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of outcomes and organisations engaged with and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about intersectoral engagement and that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of intersectoral outcomes and organisations engaged with.

·       Train researchers in how to find intersectoral collaborations.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in finding and achieving intersectoral collaborations.

·       Provide best practice examples and case studies of intersectoral collaborations that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and citizen scientists engaged across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of citizen science activities that are ongoing or completed by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and number of citizen scientists engaged by individual researchers across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of citizen scientist activities ongoing and completed across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of citizen science, outputs and outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged with across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and supporting in citizen science.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged with across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged with and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about citizen science and that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of citizen science outputs, outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged with.

·       Train researchers in citizen science.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in citizen science.

·       Provide best practice examples and case studies of citizen science that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patented and with licenses by researchers across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of research outputs that are in the process of being legalised by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patents or licenses by individual researchers across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licensed.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of research outputs in the process of being legalised across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number or research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licensed across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and supporting in legalisation of research outputs including defined IPR, patents and licensing

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licensed across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licensed and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about research exploitation and that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded, and licenses granted.

·       Train researchers in legalisation of research outputs including IPR, patents and licensing.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in legalisation of research outputs including defined IPR, patents and licensing.

·       Provide best practice examples and legalisation of research outputs including defined IPR, patents and licensing that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of Spin-offs/Start-ups that are in the process currently being created her including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of of Spin-offs/Start-ups that are in the process currently being created or that have been created across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and support in Spin-offs and Start-ups

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of research outputs with IPR, patents awarded and licensed across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services across the institution and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about entrepreneurial spirit, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of Spin-off/Start-up employees, products and services.

·       Train researchers in how to establish a Spin-offs/Start-ups

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in Spin-offs/Start-ups

·       Try to find best practice examples and legalisation of Spin-offs/Start-ups that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of methods sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make method sets being developed, finalised, and implemented openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to record the number of openly available method sets accessed and cited (where possible) with clear guidelines and expectations

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record, upload and make open access method sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload of method sets developed, finalised, and implemented across the institution and ensuring they are open access, with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload of method sets accessed and cited across the institution and ensuring they are open access; with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in development and management of method sets and ensuring they are open access,

·       Ensure there is a suitable and easily accessible database or repository to record method sets accessed and cited and that this is open access.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and make open access all method sets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making method sets open access to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to research assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to log openly available method sets accessed and cited.

·       Train researchers in development of openly available method sets.

·       Train researchers in how to ensure method sets are open access including issues specific to academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of open access method sets.

·       Senior management policies and procedures to make data management plans openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload and ensuring data management plans being developed, finalised, and implemented are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available data management plans.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making data management plans open access to both them as individuals and the institution and the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the development of openly available data management plans.

·       Train researchers in how to make data management plans open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of openly available data management plans

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of openly available FAIR data management sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make FAIR data sets openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanations.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record and upload and make open FAIR data management plans accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload of and ensuring FAIR data sets being developed, finalised and archived are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload of and ensuring FAIR data sets accessed and cited are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available FAIR data sets.

·       Ensure there is a suitable and easily accessible database or repository to record FAIR datasets accessed and cited and that this is open access.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record all openly available FAIR datasets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making FAIR datasets openly available to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to research assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record open access FAIR datasets cited and accessed.

·       Train researchers in the development of openly available FAIR datasets

·       Train researchers in how to make FAIR datasets open access including any issues specific to academic disciplines and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are best practice examples of openly available FAIR datasets developed.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make (FAIR) data set peer reviews openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload and ensuring (FAIR) data set peer reviews being drafted, submitted and accepted are open with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly accessible (FAIR) data set peer reviews.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making(FAIR) data set peer reviews open access to both them as individuals and the institution and the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the (FAIR) data set peer review process.

·       Train researchers in how to make (FAIR) data set peer review open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of (FAIR) data set peer reviews.

·       Senior management approval and decision to make software sets accessed and cited across the institution openly available,

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make software sets openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to collect the number of software sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the upload and ensuring software sets being developed, finalised and archived are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available software sets

·       Ensure there is a suitable and easily accessible database to record software sets accessed and cited and that this is open access.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and ensure open access for all software sets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making software sets open access to both them as individuals and the institutions and the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to share openly available software sets accessed and cited.

·       Train researchers in development of openly available software sets.

·       Train researchers in how to make software sets open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of open access software sets.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make software set peer reviews openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and expectations.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload and ensuring software set peer reviews drafting, submitted and accepted are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available software set peer reviews

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making software set peer reviews open access to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the software set peer review process.

·       Train researchers in how to make software set peer reviews open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of open access software set peer reviews.

·       Senior management approval and decision to make publications accessed and cited across the institution openly available,

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make publications openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to collect the number of publications accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload and ensuring publications are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available publications

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and ensure open access for all publications accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making publications open access to both them as individuals and the institutions that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record openly available publications accessed and cited.

·       Train researchers in drafting publications.

·       Train researchers in how to make publications open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of openly available publications

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of openly available peer reviews that are being drafted, submitted and accepted across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make publication peer reviews openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and expectations.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload and ensuring publication peer reviews drafting, submitted and accepted are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available publication peer reviews.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making publication peer reviews open access to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the publication peer review process.

·       Train researchers in how to develop openly available publication peer reviews including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of openly available publication peer reviews.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect number of openly available material sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to make material sets openly available (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record openly available material sets accessed and cited across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring upload of and ensuring materials being developed, finalised and implemented are open access (where possible) with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for recording the number of openly available materials accessed and cited with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in the development of openly available material sets.

·       Ensure there is a suitable and easily accessible database to record openly available material sets accessed and cited.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record all openly available material sets accessed and cited and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making material sets open access to both them as individuals and the institutions, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record openly available material sets accessed and cited.

·       Train researchers in developing material sets.

·       Train researchers in how to make material sets open access including any issues specific to the relevant academic discipline and any ethical concerns.

·       Ensure there are a range of best practice examples of open access material sets.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect information on the number of resources openly available being developed, finalised and implemented.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of information on the number of open science resources being developed finalised and implemented including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of information on the number of resources openly available being developed, finalised and implemented including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record upload and make open, resources openly available being developed, finalised and implemented.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of resources being developed, finalised and implemented across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of resources openly available, being developed, finalised and implemented.

·       Provide expertise and support in resource development and how to ensure course materials are open access.

·       Provide expertise in design of open science resources.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database and repository to record the number of resources openly available.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record, upload and share all open science resources being developed, finalised and implemented and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record, upload and share all resources developed openly.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making resources openly available to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in resource development

·       Train researchers in how to share resources being developed, finalised and implemented openly.

·       Train researchers in how to incorporate open science in the resources they develop.

·       Ensure there are best practice examples of open access resources available.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of students that have passed open science courses or courses openly available open science currently being taught or that have been taught across the institution.

·       Senior management policies and procedures to make open science courses that are currently being taught or that have been taught open access (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time to record the number of students who have passed open science courses or courses openly available across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of open science courses that are currently being taught or have been taught across the institution and any ethical issues this might create.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of students who have passed open science courses or courses openly available and providing assistance with ensuring materials are open access with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in teaching and how to ensure course materials are open access.

·       Provide expertise in design of open science courses

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of students who have passed open science courses or courses openly available that are currently being taught or have been taught across the institution.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of students who have passed teaching courses that are openly available both currently or that have been taught across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record, upload and share all open science courses taught or currently being taught.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record, upload and share all open science teaching courses (where possible) and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of making courses that are being taught or have been taught openly available to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in teaching methods.

·       Train researchers in how to share open science courses taught and courses that have been taught openly.

·       Train researchers in how to incorporate open science in their course materials.

·       Ensure there are best practice examples of open access teaching courses available.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect number of supervised student theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of researchers that are being supervised or have been supervised in open science (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of researchers supervised student theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time to record the number of supervised student theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of students that are being supervised or have been supervised in open science across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated.

·       Provide expertise and support in open science supervision.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate method or database for recording the number of supervised theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of supervised theses that are openly available and the number of supervised students in open science that have graduated and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of students that are being or have been supervised in open science to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of students they have supervised who have completed their thesis or graduated.

·       Train researchers in open science supervision.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in supervision.

·       Ensure there are some best practice examples of open science supervision available.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of information on the number of open science skills courses individuals are following, completed and obtained including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of open science skills courses individuals are following, have completed and obtained across the institution, with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide a comprehensive programme of open science skills courses for researchers.

·       Ensure researchers understand the benefit to individuals and the institution of recording this information about open science skills courses, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in the programme of open science skills courses for researchers that are offered by the institution.

·       Ensure there is clear advice and guidance on attending open science skills courses with a clear link to career development and academic success.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of projects involving open science that researchers are managing, have completed and that have been successfully evaluated (where possible) with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of projects involving Open Science that researchers are currently managing, have completed and that have been successfully evaluated across the institution with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in projects involving Open Science.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of projects that they are managing, have completed and that have been successfully evaluated to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in projects involving Open Science.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in projects involving Open Science.

·       Ensure there are some best practice examples of projects involving Open Science available.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of agreed Unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of unit management positions in open science that are assigned and completed with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time to collect the number of agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of unit management positions in open science that researchers have been assigned and completed across the institution with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science across the institution, with an understanding of any ethical issues this may create.

·       Provide expertise and support in projects involving Unit Management in Open Science.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of Unit management positions in open science assigned and completed to them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science to them as individuals and the institution, so that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of agreed unit management outputs and outcomes involving open science.

·       Train researchers in Unit management in open science.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in Open Science Unit Management.

·       Ensure there are some best practice examples of projects involving Open Science Unit Management.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of open science expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of open science expert positions that researchers have been assigned and completed with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures that support the collection of the number of open science expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time to record the number of open science expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science with clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of open science expert positions that researchers have been assigned and completed across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring the number of expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and support in projects involving open science expert positions.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record the number of expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record the number of Expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of open science expert positions that researchers have been assigned and completed them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting data on the number of expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science to them as individuals and the institution and the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of expert position outputs, expert position outputs openly available, expert position outcomes openly available and expert achievement awards in open science,

·       Train researchers in open science expert positions.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in open science expert positions.

·       Ensure there are some best practice examples of projects involving open science expert positions.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of intersectoral collaborations involving open science and outputs for open science by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of intersectoral collaborations for open science and intersectoral outputs for open science across the institution.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science. across the institution.

·       Provide expertise and supporting in intersectoral collaborations involving open science.

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record and make open the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science with across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and make open the number of intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations for open science engaged with and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making open data on the number of intersectoral engagements involving open science and outputs for open science to both, them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science both to them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and the understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record and make open intersectoral outcomes for open science and organisations engaged for open science.

·       Train researchers in how to find open science intersectoral collaborations.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in finding and achieving open science intersectoral collaborations.

·       Try to find best practice examples and case studies of open science intersectoral collaborations that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of citizen science for open science outputs, outcomes and citizen scientists engaged across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of citizen science activities involving open science that are ongoing or completed by a researcher including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and number of citizen scientists engaged by individual researchers across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and the number of citizen scientists engaged across the institution and make them open (where possible).

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of citizen scientist activities ongoing and completed across the institution and to support open access (where possible)

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of citizen science, outputs and outcomes and the number of citizen scientists engaged with across the institution and to support open access (where possible)

·       Provide expertise and supporting in citizen science involving open science

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record and make open the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and the number of citizen scientists engaged with across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and make open the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and the number of citizen scientists engaged with and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making open data on the number of citizen science activities involving open science that are ongoing or completed to both, them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making open the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and the number of citizen scientists engaged to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to research assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of citizen science outputs for open science, outcomes for open science and the number of citizen scientists engaged in open science with.

·       Train researchers in citizen science for open science.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in citizen science involving open science.

·       Try to find best practice examples and case studies of citizen science involving open science that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded, and licenses granted across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of openly available research outputs that are in the process of being legalised across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licenses granted by individual researchers across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded, and licenses granted make them open (where possible).

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of openly available research outputs in the process of being legalised across the institution and to support open access (where possible)

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded, and licenses granted across the institution and to support open access (where possible)

·       Provide expertise and supporting in openly available research outputs, defined IPR, Patents and Licensing

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record and make open the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licenses granted across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and make open the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licenses granted and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making openly available research outputs that are in the process of being legalised to both, them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making open openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded, and licenses granted to both them as individuals and the institution, so that they trust the process and understand the link to research assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of openly available research outputs with defined IPR, patents awarded and licenses awarded.

·       Train researchers in openly available research outputs legalising, defined IPR, patents and licensing.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in legalisation of research outputs, defined IPR, patents and licensing.

·       Try to find best practice examples and case studies of openly available research outputs defined IPR, patents and licensing citizen science that researchers can access and draw upon.

·       Senior management approval and decision to collect the number of open science spin-offs/start-ups employees, products and services across the institution.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to support the collection of the number of open science spin-offs/starts ups that are being created or have been created across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Senior management develop policies and procedures to collect the number of open science spin-offs/start-ups employees, products and services across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Allow researchers time (and supporting budget) to record the number of open science spin-offs/start-ups employees, products and services across the institution including clear guidelines and explanation.

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitoring and assisting with the collection of the number of open science spin-offs/starts ups that are being created or have been created and to support open access (where possible)

·       Ensure there is a member (or members) of staff responsible for monitor and assisting with the collection of the number of open science spin-offs/starts ups that are being created or have been created and to support open access (where possible)

·       Provide expertise and support in all aspects of open science start-ups/spin-offs

·       Ensure there is an appropriate database to record and make open the number of number of open science spin-offs/start-ups employees, products and services across the institution.

·       Ensure researchers know that they should record and make open the open science spin-offs/starts ups and where they can receive training in how to do this and who they should go to for help and support.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making openly available open science spin-offs/starts to both, them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to researcher assessment.

·       Explain to researchers the benefit of collecting and making open, open science spin-offs/starts ups that are being created or have being created and the number of employees, products and services these created to both them as individuals and the institution, that they trust the process and understand the link to research assessment.

·       Train researchers in where and how to record the number of open science spin-offs/start-ups employees, products and services.

·       Train researchers in all aspects of Open Science Spin-off/Start-up.

·       Ensure researchers know where to go to receive support in Open Science Spin-off/Start-ups

·       Try to find best practice examples and case studies of Open Science Spin-off/Start ups that researchers can access and draw upon.