#OpenScience

In an era where information is touted as the ultimate commodity, access to scientific research remains a battleground. Dr. Cathy Foley, Australia’s chief scientist, has embarked on a mission to dismantle the fortress of journal publishers, advocating for a world-first open access model that promises to democratize knowledge like never before.

Imagine a world where every Australian, regardless of their affiliations or financial status, has access to the latest research papers for free. It’s a vision that challenges the status quo, where valuable insights are often locked behind expensive paywalls, leaving many in the dark.

Dr. Averil Cook, a clinical psychologist, aptly compares the current state of scientific research to the Latin mass of the past, where only fragments of knowledge are accessible to the public. As professionals strive to stay abreast of advancements in their fields, they often find themselves constrained by exorbitant subscription fees and limited access.

But the tide is turning. Dr. Foley’s open access model aims to dismantle the monopolistic grip of journal publishers, offering a centralized digital library accessible to all Australians. With a MyGov account or involvement in education, individuals would have unrestricted access to a wealth of research papers, transcending the barriers imposed by traditional publishing models.

The implications of this paradigm shift are profound. No longer would knowledge be confined to ivory towers or restricted by financial constraints. Dr. Foley boldly challenges the notion that publishers should control the dissemination of knowledge, arguing that researchers shouldn’t have to relinquish their work to profit-driven entities.

At the heart of this movement lies a fundamental question of equity. Should access to knowledge be a privilege reserved for the elite few, or a fundamental right accessible to all? Dr. Foley’s vision aligns with the latter, envisioning a future where information flows freely, empowering individuals across all sectors of society.

Yet, challenges remain. Despite the growing momentum towards open access, entrenched interests and institutional inertia pose formidable obstacles. Skeptics raise concerns about the economic viability of such a model and its potential impact on academic budgets.

Nevertheless, Dr. Foley remains undeterred. With the support of stakeholders, universities, and forward-thinking publishers, she champions a vision of inclusivity and accessibility. By pooling resources and leveraging Australia’s considerable investment in research, her model promises to break down barriers and revolutionize the dissemination of knowledge.

As the world watches, Australia stands at the forefront of a global movement towards open access. Dr. Foley’s pioneering efforts may well redefine the landscape of scientific research, ushering in a new era of collaboration, innovation, and enlightenment.

In the words of Dr. Averil Cook, “Science has been curated by people in power. This information affects our lives, the people we see, and there’s no way to access it except through a filtered and biased medium.” Dr. Foley’s model seeks to dismantle these barriers, heralding a future where knowledge truly belongs to the people.

Source: The Guardian

In the age of digital transformation, where information is readily accessible with just a few clicks, we often take for granted the persistence of scholarly knowledge. However, recent studies shed light on a concerning issue: the inadequate preservation of academic research in the digital world. Let’s delve into the intricate web of digital preservation and its implications for the scholarly community.

The Evolution of Preservation

Traditionally, libraries played a crucial role in safeguarding knowledge by housing physical copies of scientific publications. This ensured that even if a publisher went bankrupt or a library closed, information remained accessible. However, with the transition to digital formats, the landscape of preservation has shifted.

Organizations like Crossref introduced systems such as the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to provide permanent pointers to digital documents, promising continued access to scholarly works. These systems rely on the existence of “dark archives,” repositories containing copies of documents assigned DOIs, to mitigate the risk of information loss.

The Alarming Reality

A recent survey conducted by Martin Eve, utilizing Crossref data, unveils a troubling reality. Despite the existence of preservation systems, a significant portion of digital documents remains inadequately preserved. Of the 7,438,037 DOIs examined, approximately 27.64% are seemingly unpreserved, posing a substantial risk to the longevity of academic research.

Moreover, the study reveals a preservation deficit among Crossref members. Shockingly, only a mere 0.96% can confirm digitally preserving over 75% of their content across multiple archives. This alarming statistic underscores the urgency of addressing the shortcomings in digital preservation practices.

Navigating the Preservation Landscape

While the study provides valuable insights, it’s essential to acknowledge its limitations. It focuses solely on a subset of archives and tracks articles with DOIs, overlooking institutional repository coverage. Nonetheless, these findings serve as a wake-up call for libraries, publishers, and researchers to reassess their approach to digital preservation.

Charting a Path Forward

As we confront the challenges of digital preservation, collaborative efforts are imperative. Establishing clear standards and investing in robust preservation infrastructure are critical steps towards ensuring the endurance of scholarly knowledge in the digital age. Furthermore, raising awareness among stakeholders about the importance of preservation is paramount in addressing this pressing issue.

The preservation of scholarly research in the digital era demands concerted action. By recognizing the significance of this issue and committing to proactive measures, we can safeguard the integrity and accessibility of academic knowledge for generations to come. Let us heed the warning signs and work towards building a resilient digital preservation ecosystem that upholds the principles of scholarly inquiry and discovery.

Eve, M. P., (2024) “Digital Scholarly Journals Are Poorly Preserved: A Study of 7 Million Articles”, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 12(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.16288

Dear Policymakers,

In a world increasingly reliant on innovation and collaboration, the principles of open science have emerged as a beacon of progress. Open science, characterized by the free exchange of knowledge, data, and methodologies, holds the promise of accelerating scientific discovery, fostering transparency, and driving societal impact. As stewards of progress, you hold a pivotal role in shaping policies that support and promote open science initiatives. Here are some useful pieces of advice to guide your efforts:

1. Embrace Open Access: Encourage and incentivize researchers to publish their findings in open access journals or repositories. By removing barriers to access, you enable broader dissemination of knowledge, ensuring that scientific breakthroughs reach the widest possible audience. Additionally, consider mandating open access policies for publicly funded research to maximize the return on investment for taxpayers.
2. Foster Collaborative Platforms: Invest in infrastructure and platforms that facilitate collaboration and data sharing among researchers. Create incentives for scientists to share data, code, and methodologies openly, promoting reproducibility and accelerating the pace of discovery. By fostering a culture of collaboration, you lay the foundation for groundbreaking interdisciplinary research and innovation.
3. Support Open Data Initiatives: Recognize the value of data as a public good and prioritize efforts to make research data openly accessible and reusable. Develop policies that mandate data management plans, ensuring that data generated through publicly funded research is preserved and shared responsibly. By unlocking the potential of data, you empower researchers to address pressing societal challenges and drive evidence-based policymaking.
4. Promote Open Science Education: Integrate open science principles into educational curricula at all levels, from primary schools to universities. Equip the next generation of scientists with the skills and mindset necessary to embrace open practices, collaboration, and transparency. By fostering a culture of openness from the outset, you cultivate a community of researchers committed to advancing the frontiers of knowledge for the greater good.
5. Invest in Open Infrastructure: Allocate resources to develop and maintain open-source tools, platforms, and repositories that support the open science ecosystem. Ensure that researchers have access to reliable infrastructure for data storage, sharing, and analysis, regardless of their geographic location or institutional affiliation. By investing in open infrastructure, you create a level playing field for researchers and promote inclusivity and diversity in the scientific community.
6. Engage Stakeholders: Foster dialogue and collaboration among policymakers, researchers, funding agencies, and civil society to co-create policies that advance the principles of open science. Solicit feedback from diverse stakeholders to ensure that policies are inclusive, equitable, and responsive to the evolving needs of the scientific community. By engaging stakeholders as partners in the policymaking process, you build trust, foster buy-in, and maximize the impact of your initiatives.

Embracing open science is not just a matter of scientific integrity but a strategic imperative for driving innovation, advancing knowledge, and addressing global challenges. By heeding these pieces of advice and championing policies that promote openness, collaboration, and transparency, you have the power to unlock the full potential of science for the betterment of society.

Photo via fp21

In the world of academia and scientific inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often encounters a formidable obstacle: insufficient funding. For researchers passionate about their work, the prospect of financial constraints can be disheartening, threatening to derail their ambitions and stifle the progress of their projects. However, amidst the challenges lie opportunities for creativity, resilience, and resourcefulness. In this blog, we delve into the complexities of navigating the research dilemma when faced with not enough funding, exploring strategies to persevere and thrive despite the odds.

Understanding the Impact of Funding Constraints

Before delving into potential solutions, it’s crucial to grasp the ramifications of limited funding on research endeavors. Insufficient financial support can hinder various aspects of the research process, from acquiring necessary equipment and materials to funding personnel and accessing specialized facilities. Moreover, it may impede the dissemination of findings through publication fees or attendance at conferences, limiting the visibility and impact of the research within the scientific community.

Embracing Creativity and Innovation

While financial resources are undoubtedly valuable, they are not the sole determinants of research success. In the face of funding constraints, researchers must cultivate a spirit of creativity and innovation, seeking alternative approaches to address their research questions. This may involve leveraging existing resources, collaborating with other institutions or researchers, or exploring unconventional methodologies that require minimal financial investment.

Seeking Alternative Funding Sources

In the quest to continue their research despite financial limitations, researchers can explore a myriad of alternative funding sources beyond traditional grants and sponsorships. Crowdfunding platforms, for instance, offer a viable avenue for engaging with the public and garnering support for research projects that resonate with a broader audience. Additionally, partnerships with industry stakeholders or non-profit organizations may provide access to funding streams aligned with the research objectives.

Maximizing Existing Resources

Resourcefulness is a hallmark of successful researchers navigating the challenges of limited funding. By maximizing existing resources and optimizing efficiency, researchers can stretch their budgetary allocations further and mitigate the impact of financial constraints. This may involve repurposing equipment, sharing facilities with other research groups, or negotiating discounted rates for essential services.

Fostering Collaborative Networks

In times of financial scarcity, collaboration emerges as a potent tool for advancing research agendas and overcoming resource limitations. By forging collaborative networks with fellow researchers, both within and outside their field of expertise, researchers can pool resources, share expertise, and amplify the impact of their collective efforts. Collaborative projects not only enhance the robustness of research outcomes but also open doors to new funding opportunities and avenues for interdisciplinary exploration.

Thriving Amidst Adversity

While not enough funding presents a formidable challenge to research endeavors, it also serves as a catalyst for resilience, ingenuity, and innovation. By embracing creativity, seeking alternative funding sources, maximizing existing resources, and fostering collaborative networks, researchers can navigate the complexities of the research landscape and continue their quest for knowledge despite the odds. Ultimately, the journey of research is marked not only by the discoveries made but also by the determination and perseverance exhibited in the face of adversity.

Photo via The Thomas B. Fordham Institute

In the ever-evolving landscape of academia, a profound shift is underway. Open Science (OS) has emerged as a beacon of collaboration and knowledge sharing, with Open Data serving as its cornerstone. But what exactly is Open Data, and how is it shaping the future of research?

At its essence, Open Data embodies the ethos of transparency and accessibility, allowing researchers to freely access and utilize datasets for their studies. This paradigm shift has ushered in a new era of “data-driven research,” where the vast reservoirs of data fuel innovation and discovery.

But amidst this wave of change, questions linger. How are different countries and disciplines embracing Open Data? What impact does this have on research practices and citation patterns? To unravel these mysteries, researchers delve into databases like the Data Citation Index (DCI) and the OpenAIRE Graph, seeking insights into the ever-shifting landscape of data-driven inquiry.

The findings are illuminating. Across diverse disciplines and geographic regions, patterns emerge, revealing the nuanced relationship between Open Data adoption and research practices. While some countries lead the charge in data publication, others lag behind, reflecting varying levels of commitment and infrastructure.

Moreover, the analysis uncovers disparities in data citation rates, shedding light on the complex interplay between data availability and scholarly recognition. Disciplines such as Crystallography stand out for their robust data citation culture, while others exhibit more modest levels of engagement.

Yet, amidst these insights lies a challenge: the limitations of existing databases. Discrepancies in data coverage and citation conventions underscore the need for continued scrutiny and refinement. As researchers navigate this data-rich terrain, they confront questions of methodology and interpretation, striving to extract meaningful insights from the vast sea of information.

In the quest for knowledge, Open Data serves as both a catalyst and a compass, guiding researchers towards new frontiers of discovery. But as the journey unfolds, one thing remains clear: the path to understanding is paved with curiosity, collaboration, and a commitment to openness.

Open Access Article

Via Numajiri, H., Hayashi, T. Analysis on open data as a foundation for data-driven research. Scientometrics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04956-x

Hey there, curious minds! Have you ever found yourself delving deep into the realms of research, only to hit a brick wall when you’re met with a paywall? Frustrating, right? Well, fear not, because the era of open access is here to liberate knowledge and revolutionize the way students access information.

Picture this: You’re a student, burning the midnight oil, working on your thesis or diving into a new area of study. You stumble upon a groundbreaking paper that could change the game for your research, only to find out it’s hidden behind a subscription fee or a hefty pay-per-view charge. It’s like having the key to unlock the door to enlightenment, only to realize it’s locked and the key costs a fortune.

Enter open access, the superhero of academia. It’s like a giant library where the doors are always open, and the books are free to borrow. In a nutshell, open access ensures that scholarly articles, research papers, and educational resources are freely available to anyone with an internet connection. No more barriers, no more boundaries – just a vast sea of knowledge waiting to be explored.

But why is open access such a big deal for students? Well, for starters, it levels the playing field. Gone are the days when access to information was reserved for those with deep pockets or institutional affiliations. Now, whether you’re a high school student writing a paper or a Ph.D. candidate pushing the boundaries of human knowledge, you have the same access to resources as anyone else.

Think about the impact this can have on education. Suddenly, students from all walks of life have the tools they need to succeed. No longer constrained by the limitations of their school’s library budget or the constraints of traditional publishing models, students are free to explore, innovate, and collaborate like never before.

But it’s not just about leveling the playing field – open access also fuels innovation and discovery. By breaking down the barriers to information, it enables researchers to build upon each other’s work, accelerating the pace of progress in every field imaginable. Ideas can flourish, hypotheses can be tested, and solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges can emerge.

And let’s not forget about the financial aspect. College tuition and textbook costs are already sky-high – do we really need to add expensive journal subscriptions to the mix? Open access ensures that students aren’t burdened with yet another expense, freeing up precious resources for other essentials like food, housing, and, dare I say it, a little bit of fun now and then.

But perhaps the most exciting thing about open access is the sense of community it fosters. When knowledge is freely shared, boundaries dissolve, and connections are formed. Students can collaborate with peers from around the globe, learn from experts in their field, and contribute to the collective pool of human understanding.

So, the next time you find yourself on a quest for knowledge, remember the power of open access. It’s more than just a way to access articles – it’s a movement that’s transforming education, driving innovation, and empowering students to reach new heights. So go ahead, dive in, and unlock the endless possibilities that await. After all, the door is open – all you have to do is walk through it.

Photo via Teacher Magazine

In the ever-evolving world of scholarly publishing, the rise of open access has stirred up quite a storm. But amidst this whirlwind of change, there’s a cloud of confusion and secrecy surrounding the money that keeps the wheels turning in the world of academic research. As Europe takes steps to make publishing fairer and more transparent, a recent study has taken a close look at the costs, policies, and practices driving scholarly publishing across the continent.

The European Union has made it clear: they want to clean up the murky waters of deals between institutions, funders, and publishers. They’re aiming for a publishing world that’s clear, open, and doesn’t rely on authors paying to publish their work.

Commissioned to help the European Commission’s push for open access, this study digs deep into how research gets published in Europe. From government policies to deals between universities and publishers, the study breaks down the money behind getting research out to the public.

One big focus of the study is on how different European countries support open access publishing. But there’s a problem: information is all over the place, and not everyone is playing by the same rules. Some countries are investing big bucks, while others seem to be holding back. This shows the urgent need for clear rules and better sharing of information.

The study also shines a light on the role of funders in the world of open access. Some are happy to foot the bill for authors to publish their work openly, while others prefer to support specific projects. But when it comes to funding newer, more experimental forms of publishing, like non-profit ventures, things get tricky. It’s clear that new ideas need new ways of funding.

Then there’s the tangled web of deals between publishers and institutions. From big agreements covering whole countries to smaller deals between individual universities and publishers, it’s a complicated world. But the details of these deals often stay hidden, making it hard to see where the money’s going.

Looking ahead, the study sees a way to get a better handle on how much open access publishing really costs. By matching up data on what gets published with how much it costs, we can get a clearer picture. But there are obstacles in the way, like confusing agreements between publishers and universities, and a lack of detailed information.

Armed with the insights from this study, policymakers and researchers are being urged to work together to make publishing fairer and more open. That means sharing more information, making contracts public, and building better systems to track what gets published and how much it costs.

In the end, this study is like a roadmap, guiding Europe towards a future where research isn’t hidden behind paywalls, but is freely available to everyone who wants to learn and discover.

Full report – click here.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of scientific research, the principles of openness, collaboration, and transparency are becoming increasingly vital. The recent collaboration between the Center for Open Science (COS) and NASA exemplifies this ethos, culminating in a groundbreaking conference scheduled for March 21 and 22, 2024. This event, which is open to all at no cost, promises to be a pivotal moment for the scientific community, as it delves into the outcomes and future prospects stemming from the 2023 Year of Open Science (YOS).

The agenda for the conference is packed with diverse sessions designed to appeal to a broad audience. From plenary sessions featuring distinguished speakers to lightning talks providing quick insights, attendees can expect a rich tapestry of discussions covering various facets of open science.

One of the highlighted sessions, titled “Reflections on a Year of Open Science,” promises to offer a comprehensive overview of the initiatives and achievements realized during the YOS. Speakers Ana Persic of UNESCO, Maryam Zaringhalam from the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and Chelle Gentemann of NASA will provide invaluable insights into the progress made and the path forward. Moderated by Lisa Cuevas Shaw of COS and Alison Parker from the Wilson Center Science and Technology Innovation Program, this session sets the tone for reflection and strategic planning.

Another session, “The Critical Roles of Grassroots Initiatives and Communities,” underscores the importance of bottom-up approaches in driving the adoption of open science practices. With speakers representing diverse grassroots movements and communities, including Gathering for Open Science Hardware and PREreview, attendees will gain a deeper appreciation for the power of collective action in fostering openness and inclusivity in research.

NASA’s contributions to the open science movement are also prominently featured, with sessions focusing on advances in research evaluation and ongoing activities within US federal agencies. These discussions, led by experts such as Eva Méndez, Haley Hazlett, and Caitlin Carter, highlight the agency’s commitment to embracing open science principles and fostering collaboration on a global scale.

Moreover, the conference addresses critical issues such as open source scientific hardware, transparency across the research lifespan, and the security of open science software and data. By convening experts from academia, industry, and government, these sessions aim to chart a course towards a more transparent, equitable, and secure research ecosystem.

The conference organizers have extended invitations to a diverse array of stakeholders, including funders, university leaders, policymakers, and members of the research community. This inclusive approach underscores the importance of collective action in advancing the principles of open science.

As we look towards the future, it is clear that embracing open science is not merely an option but a necessity. By fostering collaboration, transparency, and inclusivity, we can unlock the full potential of scientific research and address some of the most pressing challenges facing humanity. The COS-NASA conference represents a crucial step forward on this journey, providing a platform for dialogue, reflection, and collective action. Whether you are a seasoned researcher, a policymaker, or simply passionate about the future of science, this event promises to inspire and inform. Register now to be a part of this transformative moment in the history of science.

Register for free here.

In the age of digital information, access to knowledge is often seen as a fundamental right, vital for both researchers and the general public alike. However, the reality is often far from ideal, with a significant portion of scholarly research locked behind paywalls and subscription fees. While subscriptions have long been the norm for academic journals and databases, their impact on open access cannot be overstated. In this blog post, we delve into the hidden costs of subscriptions and how they pose a barrier to open access for both researchers and the public.

1. Restricted Access to Research: One of the most glaring issues with subscription-based models is the restricted access they impose on scholarly research. Many high-impact journals and databases require expensive subscriptions, effectively putting a price tag on knowledge. This means that individuals without access through institutional affiliations or personal subscriptions are often left in the dark, unable to reach crucial research findings. Such restrictions not only hinder the progress of individual researchers but also impede the advancement of knowledge as a whole.
2. Financial Burden on Institutions: Subscriptions come with a hefty price tag, and these costs are often shouldered by academic institutions, libraries, and research organizations. The ever-increasing subscription fees can strain institutional budgets, forcing them to make difficult decisions about which resources to prioritize. This financial burden not only limits the institutions’ ability to provide access to a wide range of research but also diverts funds away from other critical areas such as faculty development, student support, and infrastructure improvement.
3. Exclusion of Marginalized Communities: The subscription-based model exacerbates inequalities in access to information, particularly for marginalized communities. Individuals from low-income backgrounds, researchers in developing countries, and independent scholars often face significant barriers in accessing subscription-based content due to financial constraints. This perpetuates disparities in knowledge dissemination, reinforcing existing power imbalances within academia and society at large.
4. Stifling Innovation and Collaboration: Open access fosters collaboration and innovation by allowing researchers from diverse backgrounds to freely access and build upon existing knowledge. However, subscription barriers hinder this collaborative spirit by limiting the circulation of research findings. As a result, potential collaborations may be stifled, and valuable insights may remain untapped, ultimately slowing down the pace of scientific progress.
5. Impact on Public Understanding: Access to scientific research shouldn’t be limited to academic circles alone; it’s equally essential for the public to engage with and understand the latest advancements. Subscription barriers prevent broader dissemination of knowledge to the public, hindering science communication efforts and impeding informed decision-making on societal issues. This lack of accessibility undermines the democratic principles of knowledge sharing and stifles public discourse on matters of scientific importance.

While subscriptions may offer a revenue stream for publishers, their impact on open access cannot be ignored. The barriers they pose to researchers and the public hinder the free flow of information, stifle collaboration and innovation, and perpetuate inequalities in knowledge dissemination. As advocates for open access, it’s crucial for researchers, institutions, and policymakers to explore alternative models that prioritize equitable access to scholarly research for all. Only by breaking down these barriers can we truly realize the transformative potential of open access for advancing knowledge and benefiting society as a whole.

Photo via PCmag

Today, let’s dive into a topic that’s as diverse as the colors of the rainbow: diversity in academia. Picture this: academia is like a vibrant garden, bursting with different flowers, each unique in its beauty and contribution. But just like any garden, it requires care and attention to ensure that all flowers, regardless of their shape, size, or color, have the opportunity to thrive. So, let’s grab our watering cans and gardening gloves as we explore what diversity in academia truly means and how we can nurture it fairly.

First things first, what exactly is diversity in academia? Well, it’s not just about ticking boxes or meeting quotas. Diversity is about recognizing and celebrating the rich tapestry of human experiences, perspectives, and backgrounds that make up the academic community. It’s about embracing differences in race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, disability, and more, because it’s these differences that enrich our collective understanding and propel us forward in our quest for knowledge.

Now, you might be wondering: how do we ensure that our academic garden is truly diverse and inclusive? Here are a few human-friendly strategies to consider:

1. Cultivating Inclusive Spaces: Just like plants need the right soil to grow, people need inclusive environments to thrive. This means creating spaces where everyone feels welcome, valued, and respected, regardless of who they are or where they come from. It’s about fostering a culture of belonging where diverse voices are heard and celebrated.
2. Seeding Opportunities Equitably: Imagine if only certain flowers were given sunlight and water, while others were left to wither in the shade. That wouldn’t be fair, right? Similarly, we must ensure that opportunities for education, funding, mentorship, and advancement are distributed equitably among all members of the academic community. This might mean implementing targeted outreach programs, providing financial support for marginalized students, or actively seeking out diverse perspectives in hiring and promotion decisions.
3. Nurturing Talent and Potential: Just like plants need care and attention to reach their full potential, so too do aspiring scholars from underrepresented backgrounds. This means providing mentorship, support, and resources to help them flourish academically and professionally. It’s about recognizing and nurturing talent wherever it may be found, rather than confining it to traditional molds or expectations.
4. Harvesting the Fruits of Diversity: Diversity isn’t just a feel-good buzzword; it’s also a catalyst for innovation and excellence. Research has shown time and again that diverse teams are more creative, more productive, and better equipped to tackle complex problems. By harnessing the power of diversity, we can unlock new insights, break down barriers, and pave the way for groundbreaking discoveries that benefit us all.
5. Continuously Tending to the Garden: Achieving diversity and inclusion isn’t a one-time task; it’s an ongoing commitment that requires constant care and attention. Just as a garden requires regular watering, pruning, and weeding to stay healthy, so too does academia require ongoing efforts to address systemic biases, dismantle barriers, and promote fairness and equity for all.

So there you have it, my fellow gardeners of knowledge: a human-friendly guide to fostering diversity and inclusion in academia. By embracing our differences, nurturing our collective potential, and tending to our academic garden with care and compassion, we can create a more vibrant, equitable, and flourishing scholarly community for generations to come. Let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work, because together, we can cultivate a brighter future for academia and beyond!

Photo via builtin