#ResearchAssessment

Discussion on How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science at the MCAA Annual Conference
Discussion on How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science at the MCAA Annual Conference 1024 768 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open science is a movement that promotes transparency, collaboration, and sharing of research data and results. The aim is to make science more accessible and reproducible, which in turn accelerates scientific progress. However, one of the biggest challenges facing open science is the lack of incentives for researchers to engage in open practices. This issue was addressed at the MCAA Annual Conference by representatives of the OPUS project, Gareth O’Neill (Technopolis Group), Clare Viney (Vitae), Brian Cahill (MCAA), and Sebastian Dahle (Eurodoc), in a panel discussion on “How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science?”

During the session, various questions were discussed, including the precarity of a research career, the obstacles for Research Assessment, and indicators and metrics on how researchers should be rewarded for Open Science. The team members presented the activities of the OPUS project, which is currently developing a set of interventions and metrics for Open Science towards a system that incentivizes and rewards researchers to take up practices of providing open access to research outputs, early and open sharing of research, participation in open peer-review, measures to ensure reproducibility of results, and involving all stakeholders in co-creation.

Insights from the audience during the session

During the session, the audience was asked to participate with feedback on specific questions regarding open science and research assessment. Some results are
presented below.

Some ideas on how researchers can be rewarded for practicing

Financial suppport

The discussion highlighted some ways in which researchers can be rewarded for practicing open science. Financial support is one of them, where funding agencies and research institutions can provide financial incentives to researchers who engage in open science. Institutions could also reward researchers who publish in open-access journals by providing additional funding or recognition. These financial incentives can motivate researchers to embrace open science and make their research more accessible to the wider scientific community.

Academic promotions and awards

Researchers can also be recognized for their contributions to open science through academic promotions and awards. Institutions could create specific awards for researchers who engage in open science, such as the “Open Science Award” or “Open Data Award.” These awards could be given to researchers who have made significant contributions to open science, such as sharing data, developing open-source software, or publishing in open-access journals. Furthermore, institutions could consider open science activities when making academic promotions and tenure decisions.

Collaboration and opportunities for networking

Collaboration and opportunities for networking are also essential rewards for researchers. Open science practices can facilitate collaboration between researchers, as open data and research findings are more accessible to others in the scientific community. Institutions could provide researchers with opportunities to network and collaborate with others who share their open science values. This could be achieved through organized events, such as workshops and conferences, or through online communities, such as social media groups or open science forums.

Public engagement and outreach

Lastly, researchers could be rewarded through increased public engagement and outreach. Open science practices can help to increase the public’s understanding and appreciation of scientific research. Institutions could recognize and reward researchers who engage in open science practices that promote public engagement, such as communicating their research findings to the media or presenting at public events.

What are the next steps and how can OPUS help?

The OPUS project is currently developing a researcher assessment framework together with interventions to support the implementation of the framework at research-performing organizations and research-funding organizations. The framework will provide a comprehensive suite of indicators for these organizations to incentivize and reward their researchers for Open Science. The draft framework will be shared with key stakeholders and the research community for feedback through a public consultation in 2023.

In conclusion, by rewarding researchers for their contributions to open science, we can incentivize more researchers to embrace open science practices, leading to more accessible and reproducible research, and ultimately, scientific progress. The OPUS project is working towards this goal, and it is hoped that the researcher assessment framework developed by the project will help organizations to incentivize and reward their researchers for Open Science practices.

Open Science and Life Expectancy
Open Science and Life Expectancy 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Life expectancy is a measure of the average number of years that a person is expected to live, based on factors such as age, sex, and geographic location. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including genetics, lifestyle, environmental conditions, and access to healthcare. Over the past century, life expectancy has increased dramatically in many parts of the world, thanks to improvements in public health, medical technology, and social and economic development. However, there are still significant disparities in life expectancy between different regions and populations, and many people continue to die prematurely from preventable or treatable diseases.

Open science can play a crucial role in addressing these challenges by facilitating the sharing of scientific knowledge and data. For example, open access publications allow researchers and healthcare professionals from around the world to access the latest research findings, clinical guidelines, and best practices for disease prevention and treatment. This can help to accelerate the development and adoption of effective healthcare interventions, reduce duplication of effort, and improve the overall quality of research and patient care.

In addition, open science can promote collaboration between different stakeholders in the healthcare ecosystem, including researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and patient advocates. By sharing data and insights, these stakeholders can work together to identify the root causes of health disparities and develop evidence-based solutions that address the underlying social, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to poor health outcomes. This approach can help to promote equity and social justice in healthcare, and ensure that everyone has access to the resources and support they need to live healthy, fulfilling lives.

One area where open science has already had a significant impact is in the study of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of open science in enabling rapid and collaborative research on the virus and its transmission, as well as the development and distribution of vaccines and treatments. Open access repositories such as the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) have played a critical role in enabling researchers from around the world to access and share data on the virus, leading to important discoveries and breakthroughs in our understanding of the disease.

Open science has the potential to contribute significantly to improving life expectancy by facilitating the sharing of scientific knowledge and data, promoting collaboration between different stakeholders, and promoting equity and social justice in healthcare. As we continue to face global health challenges such as pandemics, chronic diseases, and health inequalities, it is essential that we embrace open science as a key tool for addressing these challenges and promoting the health and wellbeing of all people, regardless of their background or circumstances.

Research and FinTech: The Intersection of Innovation and Insights
Research and FinTech: The Intersection of Innovation and Insights 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

FinTech, short for financial technology, has been one of the fastest-growing industries in recent years. With the rise of digitalization, FinTech companies have emerged to provide alternative financial solutions to traditional banking systems. From online payments to peer-to-peer lending, FinTech has revolutionized the way we manage our finances.

However, the success of FinTech companies wouldn’t have been possible without the significant role of research in the industry. Research and FinTech go hand in hand, as innovation and insights are critical to the development and growth of the industry. In this article, we will explore the intersection of research and FinTech and how they complement each other.

FinTech companies are known for their innovative products and services. However, developing innovative solutions requires significant research to understand market trends, consumer preferences, and emerging technologies. Research provides the foundation for innovation in the FinTech industry.

One of the essential components of FinTech is its focus on understanding consumer behavior. FinTech companies must understand the needs and wants of their target market to develop relevant and innovative products and services. This is where research comes in, providing insights into consumer behavior and preferences.

Market research allows FinTech companies to identify gaps in the market and develop solutions that meet the needs of their target market. By analyzing consumer behavior, companies can tailor their products and services to ensure they meet the expectations of their customers. Research can also help identify potential challenges and obstacles in the market, enabling FinTech companies to adapt and evolve their strategies.

Research in FinTech can take many forms, from basic scientific research to applied research focused on developing new products and services. Basic research in fields such as computer science, mathematics, and physics has been instrumental in laying the groundwork for many of the key innovations in FinTech. For example, advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence have enabled the development of predictive analytics and automated trading systems that are revolutionizing the way financial markets operate.

At the same time, applied research is also playing a critical role in the development of FinTech. Companies and organizations around the world are investing heavily in research to develop new products and services that can help them stay competitive in an increasingly crowded marketplace. This research is focused on a wide range of areas, including mobile payments, blockchain technology, and digital currencies.

Important area of research in FinTech is data analysis. The vast amounts of data generated by financial transactions, social media, and other sources provide a wealth of opportunities for researchers to uncover new insights and develop new models for predicting consumer behavior and market trends. This research is helping to drive the development of new products and services that are tailored to the specific needs of consumers and businesses.

The intersection between research and fintech has opened up new possibilities for financial services and has significantly impacted the way we manage our finances. The use of big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence has enabled fintech companies to provide innovative solutions that are more efficient and user-friendly compared to traditional financial institutions. The importance of research cannot be overstated in this field, as it allows fintech companies to constantly evolve and improve their services. Going forward, it is expected that research will continue to play a vital role in the development of fintech, and we can anticipate further advancements that will transform the financial industry in ways we can only imagine.

Methods of Research Assessment
Methods of Research Assessment 1024 681 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Research is an essential aspect of the scientific and academic world. The quality of research is determined by its validity, reliability, and the level of impact it has on society. Hence, it is essential to evaluate research methods and techniques to ensure they meet the required standards. The process of research assessment is critical in providing a basis for decision-making by scholars, funders, and policymakers. Here are some of the methods used to assess research.

Peer Review

Peer review is one of the most common methods of research assessment. It involves the evaluation of a research paper by experts in the same field to ensure that it meets the required standards. Peer review ensures that research is reliable and valid, and also helps to identify gaps and areas of improvement.

Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliometric analysis involves the use of quantitative measures to assess the impact of research publications. This method involves analyzing the number of citations a publication has received, the number of publications by a researcher or institution, and the h-index of a researcher, which is a measure of their productivity and impact.

Altmetrics

Altmetrics are alternative metrics that provide a different view of research impact beyond traditional citations. These metrics capture online attention and engagement with research such as social media mentions, downloads, and views. Altmetrics provide a broader view of research impact and can help to identify research that has a wider societal impact.

Expert Review

Expert review involves the evaluation of research by experts in the field who provide an objective assessment of the quality of research. This method involves evaluating the methodology, results, and conclusions of the research to ensure they meet the required standards.

Impact Assessment

Impact assessment involves evaluating the impact of research on society. This method involves evaluating the extent to which research has influenced policy, practice, or societal outcomes. Impact assessment provides evidence of the value of research to society and can help to inform future research priorities.

Conclusion

Research assessment is an essential process that helps to ensure the quality and impact of research. The methods of research assessment vary, and each has its strengths and weaknesses. However, the combination of these methods can provide a more comprehensive view of research quality and impact. Researchers, funders, and policymakers must continue to use a combination of these methods to ensure that research meets the required standards and has a positive impact on society.

Open Science is Changing Universities
Open Science is Changing Universities 1024 731 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open Science is a rapidly growing movement that is transforming the way universities conduct research and share knowledge. The principles of Open Science, which include transparency, collaboration, and accessibility, are becoming increasingly important in today’s academic world. In this article, we will explore how Open Science is changing universities and what this means for the future of research.

One of the most significant ways that Open Science is changing universities is by promoting open access to research findings. Open access means that research articles and data are freely available online for anyone to read, download, and reuse. This approach is in contrast to the traditional publishing model, where research findings are often locked behind paywalls, making it difficult for many people to access them.

Open access is an important part of Open Science because it makes research more accessible and visible to the broader public. This, in turn, can help to increase the impact and relevance of research findings. In addition, open access can also help to address issues of equity and inclusion, ensuring that research is accessible to all, regardless of their financial resources.

Another way that Open Science is changing universities is by promoting collaboration and data sharing. Open Science encourages researchers to share their data, code, and methods with others in the research community. This approach can help to improve the quality and reproducibility of research findings, as other researchers can verify and build upon the work.

Moreover, Open Science can also help to break down disciplinary boundaries and encourage interdisciplinary collaboration. By sharing data and methods, researchers from different fields can work together to solve complex problems and generate new insights. This collaborative approach can lead to more innovative and impactful research.

Open Science is also changing the way universities evaluate and reward research. Traditionally, academic success has been measured by publications in high-impact journals and the acquisition of research grants. However, Open Science encourages a more holistic approach to research evaluation, where the quality and impact of research are assessed based on factors such as open access, data sharing, and collaboration.

This new approach to research evaluation can help to incentivize and reward researchers who engage in Open Science practices. In addition, it can also help to shift the focus from the quantity of publications to the quality and impact of research.

Open Science is a rapidly growing movement that is transforming the way universities conduct research and share knowledge. By promoting open access, collaboration, and data sharing, Open Science is making research more accessible, visible, and impactful. As universities continue to adopt Open Science practices, we can expect to see more innovative and collaborative research that addresses complex global challenges.

Open Science Literature Review
Open Science Literature Review 1024 776 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The team behind the OPUS project examined literature on Open Science. This has been conducted (and will later be updated) as part of state-of-the-art on literature to reform research(er) assessment and incentivize and reward Open Science, to stay up-to-date on research assessment reform and encourage Open Science practices.

Open Science (OS) has emerged as an inclusive movement that aims to make scientific knowledge multilingual, openly available, accessible, and reusable for everyone. The movement also seeks to increase scientific collaborations and sharing of information, and to open the processes of scientific knowledge creation, evaluation, and communication to societal actors beyond the traditional scientific community. To achieve these goals, the research community needs to reform the researcher assessment system and incentivize and reward OS practices. The OPUS project was initiated to address this need, and it has three main components: incentives for OS, metrics and indicators for OS, and pilots to implement and monitor OS.

The first component, incentives for OS, involves a review of the existing literature on researcher assessment and the incentivization of OS practices. The review found that the current assessment system focuses too much on bibliometrics, which involves peer-reviewed publications and citations in top journals. To promote OS, the research community needs a more comprehensive approach that includes research/non-research, open/closed, and quantitative/qualitative dimensions. The literature also suggests several proposals for frameworks, including principles, guidelines, support, and indicators/metrics to reform researcher assessment.

The second component, metrics and indicators for OS, involves the identification of key metrics and indicators that can measure the impact of OS practices. This component is crucial for incentivizing and rewarding OS, as it enables the research community to measure the impact of OS practices and their contribution to the scientific community and society. The OPUS project is currently developing a framework of indicators/metrics for researcher assessment, including OS, to promote the adoption of OS practices in research-performing and research-funding organizations.

The third component, pilots to implement and monitor OS, involves the implementation of the framework developed in the second component in research-performing and research-funding organizations. The pilots will test the effectiveness of the framework and identify any areas that require improvement. The ultimate goal of the pilots is to promote the adoption of OS practices and reform the researcher assessment system to incentivize and reward OS practices.

In conclusion, the OPUS project is a vital initiative that seeks to promote OS practices, reform the researcher assessment system, and incentivize and reward OS practices. The project’s three components, incentives for OS, metrics and indicators for OS, and pilots to implement and monitor OS, provide a comprehensive approach to promoting OS and ensuring its adoption in the research community. Ultimately, the adoption of OS practices will enable the research community to increase scientific collaborations, sharing of information, and open engagement of societal actors, leading to greater trust in science by researchers and the public.

Country Leaders of Open Science
Country Leaders of Open Science 1024 682 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open Science is an initiative that aims to make scientific research more transparent, accessible, and reproducible. It is based on the principles of open access, open data, open source, and open peer review. The goal of open science is to improve the quality and impact of scientific research, to accelerate scientific discovery, and to make science more relevant and useful to society.

Several countries around the world have recognized the potential of open science and have taken initiatives to promote it. These countries have implemented policies and strategies that support open science, such as open access mandates, data management policies, and open science platforms. In this article, we will highlight some of the country leaders of open science and their initiatives.

  1. The Netherlands

The Netherlands is a pioneer in open science, and its government has been promoting open access to scientific publications since 2003. In 2013, the Dutch government launched the National Plan Open Science, which aims to make all publicly funded scientific publications in the Netherlands open access by 2020. The plan also promotes open data, open peer review, and citizen science. The Netherlands also hosts the Open Science Centre, a platform that provides tools and resources for open science.

  1. United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has been a strong advocate for open science, and its government has implemented several policies to promote it. In 2012, the UK government launched the Finch Report, which recommended that all publicly funded research should be made available in open access. In 2016, the UK government launched the Open Research Data Task Force, which aims to promote open data in research. The UK also hosts the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) open access policy, which requires all research articles and conference papers resulting from UKRI funding to be made open access.

  1. Canada

Canada has been a leader in open science, and its government has implemented policies and initiatives to promote it. In 2015, the Canadian government launched the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy, which requires all peer-reviewed articles funded by the three major federal research funding agencies to be made open access within 12 months of publication. The Canadian government also launched the Open Science Implementation Plan, which aims to make all federally funded research data openly available by default.

  1. United States

The United States has also recognized the importance of open science and has implemented several policies and initiatives to promote it. In 2013, the Obama administration launched the Open Data Policy, which requires federal agencies to make their data open and machine-readable by default. In 2019, the US government launched the Federal Data Strategy, which aims to improve the management and use of federal data. The US government also hosts several open science platforms, such as the open data portal and the Open Science Framework.

  1. European Union

The European Union has also taken initiatives to promote open science. In 2016, the European Commission launched the Open Science Policy Platform, which provides advice and recommendations on open science to the Commission. In 2018, the European Commission launched the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC), which aims to provide a single access point for European research data. The EOSC also promotes open data, open access, and open science practices.

Open science is an initiative that is gaining momentum worldwide, and several countries are taking initiatives to promote it. These initiatives are aimed at making scientific research more accessible, transparent, and reproducible. The leaders of open science have implemented policies and strategies that support open access, open data, open source, and open peer review. As a result, scientific research is becoming more relevant and useful to society, and scientific discovery is accelerating.

Scientific Research Raises People From Poverty
Scientific Research Raises People From Poverty 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Scientific research has been instrumental in lifting people out of poverty, improving their quality of life, and helping them realize their full potential. Through innovative ideas, groundbreaking discoveries, and cutting-edge technologies, scientific research has transformed the world we live in, making it a better place to live for all.

One of the most significant contributions of scientific research to poverty reduction has been in the field of agriculture. Modern agricultural techniques have increased crop yields, reduced soil degradation, and improved the quality of crops, resulting in higher incomes for farmers and improved food security for communities. Advances in agricultural science have enabled farmers to grow crops in previously barren areas, leading to increased production and income.

Medical research has also played a vital role in reducing poverty, improving people’s health and well-being. Through the development of vaccines and medicines, scientists have helped to prevent and treat diseases that have historically plagued impoverished communities. Medical research has also led to the discovery of new treatments for chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cancer, and heart disease, which disproportionately affect low-income communities.

In addition to agriculture and medicine, scientific research has also contributed to poverty reduction through the development of renewable energy technologies. Access to affordable and reliable energy is critical for economic development, and renewable energy technologies such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power have the potential to provide clean and sustainable energy to millions of people around the world. Scientific research has helped to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these technologies, making them more accessible to low-income communities.

Furthermore, scientific research has also contributed to poverty reduction through the development of innovative solutions to social problems. For example, researchers have developed low-cost water filtration systems, which have helped to provide clean drinking water to communities in developing countries. Similarly, advances in information technology have enabled low-income communities to access educational resources and job opportunities, helping to break the cycle of poverty and improve their quality of life.

Scientific research has been instrumental in raising people out of poverty and improving their lives. Through innovative ideas, groundbreaking discoveries, and cutting-edge technologies, scientists have transformed the world we live in, making it a better place for all. As we continue to face complex challenges, such as climate change, inequality, and global health crises, scientific research will continue to play a critical role in addressing these issues and improving the lives of people around the world.

Young Talents in Scientific Community
Young Talents in Scientific Community 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The scientific community is full of talented individuals who are passionate about their work and have the potential to make significant contributions to their field. However, finding these young talents can sometimes be a challenge. In this article, we will explore some of the ways that young talents in the scientific community can be discovered and nurtured.

Firstly, it is important to encourage young people to pursue their interests in science from a young age. This can be done by providing opportunities for them to explore different areas of science and technology, such as through science camps or after-school programs. By providing a supportive environment and access to resources, young people can begin to develop their interests and talents in science.

Another way to discover young talents in the scientific community is to support and mentor undergraduate and graduate students. These students are often working on cutting-edge research projects and may have unique insights or innovative ideas that can contribute to the field. By providing mentorship and support, researchers can help to develop these students’ skills and encourage them to continue their work in the future.

In addition, scientific conferences and competitions can provide a platform for young talents to showcase their work and gain recognition in their field. These events bring together researchers from around the world and provide opportunities for networking and collaboration. By participating in these events, young talents can gain valuable experience and exposure to the latest research in their field.

Another important factor in discovering young talents in the scientific community is diversity and inclusion. By promoting diversity in the scientific community, researchers can ensure that they are not overlooking talented individuals from underrepresented groups. This can be done by providing mentorship and support to students from diverse backgrounds, as well as by creating an inclusive and welcoming environment for all scientists.

Finally, funding agencies and research institutions can play a critical role in discovering and nurturing young talents in the scientific community. By providing funding and resources for innovative research projects, these organizations can help to support the next generation of scientists and encourage them to pursue their passions in science.

To sum up, discovering young talents in the scientific community is crucial for advancing scientific research and innovation. By providing opportunities for exploration and development, supporting undergraduate and graduate students, promoting diversity and inclusion, and providing funding and resources for research, we can help to ensure that the next generation of scientists is equipped to make significant contributions to their fields.

How Technology is Revolutionizing Scientific Research
How Technology is Revolutionizing Scientific Research 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The 21st century has witnessed a digital revolution that has impacted virtually every aspect of our lives, including the way we conduct scientific research. Digitalization has transformed the way we generate, analyze, store, and share data, making it easier for scientists to collaborate and disseminate their findings to a wider audience. At the same time, the rise of open science has challenged traditional practices in scientific research, encouraging greater transparency, collaboration, and accessibility.

Digitalization and open science are closely intertwined, as both rely on technology to enable new modes of scientific inquiry. Digitalization has allowed researchers to generate and collect vast amounts of data, using sophisticated sensors, imaging techniques, and computational tools. For example, the field of genomics has been revolutionized by advances in high-throughput sequencing technology, which can generate massive amounts of DNA data in a matter of hours. Similarly, the field of neuroscience has benefited from advanced imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which can capture detailed images of brain activity in real-time.

Once collected, these large datasets can be analyzed using powerful computational tools, such as machine learning algorithms, to identify patterns and insights that would be impossible to discern with traditional statistical methods. These tools can help researchers to uncover new associations and relationships between variables, and to develop more accurate models and predictions.

Open science, on the other hand, seeks to make scientific research more transparent, collaborative, and accessible to the wider community. This movement is driven by a growing recognition that scientific knowledge is a public good, and that research findings should be openly shared and evaluated by the scientific community. Open science encompasses a range of practices, including open access publishing, preprints, open data, and open peer review.

Open access publishing is a key component of open science, as it makes scientific publications freely available to anyone with an internet connection, rather than being restricted to those with access to expensive journal subscriptions. This model has gained traction in recent years, with many funding agencies and universities requiring researchers to publish their findings in open access journals.

Preprints are another important aspect of open science, as they allow researchers to share their findings with the scientific community before they undergo peer review. This enables researchers to receive feedback and improve their research before it is formally published, and can also help to accelerate the pace of scientific discovery.

Open data is another key component of open science, as it makes scientific data freely available to other researchers and the public. This can help to promote transparency, enable replication of results, and facilitate collaboration between researchers from different disciplines and institutions.

Finally, open peer review seeks to make the peer review process more transparent and accountable, by allowing reviewers to sign their reviews and share them publicly. This can help to reduce bias and promote constructive criticism, while also promoting greater engagement and participation from the scientific community.

Overall, digitalization and open science are transforming the landscape of scientific research, enabling new modes of inquiry and promoting greater transparency, collaboration, and accessibility. While these developments are not without challenges, including concerns around data privacy and quality control, they hold great promise for advancing scientific knowledge and addressing some of the world’s most pressing challenges. As technology continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how these trends continue to shape the future of scientific research.

Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Our Privacy Policy can be read here.

Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.