OpenScience

Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge
Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The dissemination of scientific knowledge is an essential aspect of the scientific enterprise. It refers to the process of sharing scientific findings, theories, and ideas with the wider community. Dissemination can take many forms, including peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, lectures, social media posts, and outreach programs. Effective dissemination of scientific knowledge is crucial for advancing scientific research, promoting evidence-based decision-making, and informing public policy.

One of the main goals of scientific research is to expand our understanding of the natural world and to develop new technologies, medicines, and solutions to pressing problems. However, this knowledge is of little use if it remains confined to the narrow circle of researchers who produced it. Dissemination is essential to ensure that scientific knowledge reaches a broader audience, including other scientists, policymakers, practitioners, educators, and the general public. By disseminating their findings, scientists can solicit feedback, collaboration, and support, and contribute to the growth of knowledge in their field.

Peer-reviewed publications are the traditional mode of scientific dissemination. In this process, scientists submit their work to specialized journals, where it undergoes rigorous review by experts in the field. If the work is deemed to be of high quality and significance, it is published and made available to other researchers worldwide. Peer-reviewed publications have several advantages, including ensuring the quality and accuracy of the scientific work, allowing for constructive criticism and feedback, and establishing priority and recognition for the authors. However, the process can be slow, exclusive, and expensive, and it may not reach non-specialist audiences.

Conference presentations and lectures are another way to disseminate scientific knowledge. They offer a more immediate and interactive forum for scientists to share their work, discuss ideas, and network with colleagues. Conferences can also provide opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration, exposure to new research, and career development. However, attending conferences can be costly, time-consuming, and limited to specific audiences.

Social media and other digital platforms are increasingly being used to disseminate scientific knowledge to wider audiences. Social media offers scientists the ability to communicate their findings in a more accessible and engaging way, reach larger audiences, and facilitate public engagement with science. However, social media platforms also have limitations, such as the potential for misinformation, the lack of quality control, and the brevity of the messages.

Outreach programs, such as science museums, public lectures, and school visits, are another way to disseminate scientific knowledge to the general public. These programs aim to increase public understanding and appreciation of science, inspire young people to pursue scientific careers, and promote scientific literacy and critical thinking skills. Outreach programs have several advantages, including making science more accessible, engaging, and relevant to diverse audiences, fostering dialogue and trust between scientists and the public, and improving the reputation and visibility of science. However, outreach programs can also be limited by funding, resources, and outreach capacity.

Dissemination of scientific knowledge is a vital component of the scientific enterprise. Effective dissemination can enhance the impact, relevance, and credibility of scientific research, promote public engagement and understanding of science, and contribute to evidence-based decision-making. Scientists must choose the appropriate dissemination strategies that best suit their research goals, audience, and resources, while also ensuring the quality, accuracy, and ethics of their work. Moreover, policymakers, funders, and the public must support and invest in dissemination efforts to promote a culture of scientific openness, collaboration, and progress.

Digital Open Data Movement
Digital Open Data Movement 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

In today’s digital age, data is everywhere, from the websites we visit to the devices we use to communicate with one another. The abundance of data available in the digital world has led to a new movement, known as “digital open data,” which aims to make this data available to everyone.

Digital open data refers to the practice of making digital data freely available for anyone to access, use, and share without any restrictions. This data can come from a variety of sources, such as government agencies, scientific research institutions, and private companies.

The importance of digital open data lies in its potential to promote transparency, accountability, and innovation in various fields. For example, open data can help citizens hold their governments accountable by providing access to information about public spending, environmental regulations, and other policies. Open data can also help researchers and businesses develop new products and services by providing them with valuable insights into consumer behavior, market trends, and other relevant data.

Governments around the world have been at the forefront of the digital open data movement, with many launching their own open data portals to make government data accessible to the public. For example, the US government’s open data portal provides access to a wide range of data, from crime statistics to healthcare information. The European Union has also launched its own open data portal, which provides access to data from across the EU, including data on the economy, the environment, and transportation.

Beyond government data, many other organizations are also making their data available through digital open data initiatives. For example, scientific institutions are increasingly making their research data open and accessible to other researchers around the world. This has the potential to accelerate scientific progress by allowing researchers to build on each other’s work and collaborate more effectively.

Private companies are also beginning to embrace digital open data, with some companies making their data available to the public for free or for a fee. For example, one ride-sharing company has launched an open data initiative that provides access to data on traffic patterns and other transportation-related information. This data can be used by researchers, policymakers, and businesses to better understand urban mobility and develop new transportation solutions.

While digital open data has the potential to bring about many benefits, there are also challenges that need to be addressed. One of the main challenges is ensuring that the data is accurate, reliable, and up-to-date. This requires careful management and maintenance of the data, as well as the development of tools and standards to ensure data quality.

Another challenge is ensuring that the data is accessible and usable by everyone, including those who may not have the technical expertise or resources to work with the data. This requires efforts to promote digital literacy and provide training and support for individuals and organizations working with open data.

Digital open data is a powerful tool that has the potential to transform many areas of society, from government transparency to scientific research to business innovation. As more organizations embrace digital open data initiatives, it is important to ensure that the data is accurate, accessible, and usable by everyone. With the right policies, tools, and standards in place, digital open data can help create a more transparent, accountable, and innovative world.

OPUS First Newsletter Unveils Inaugural Release: Dive into the Latest Open Science Insights
OPUS First Newsletter Unveils Inaugural Release: Dive into the Latest Open Science Insights 1024 530 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

OPUS Newsletter has recently released its first edition, packed with insightful reviews of Open Science initiatives and literature. The newsletter’s State-of-the-Art analysis covers key experts, organizations, networks, and projects associated with Open Science. Additionally, the literature review not only critiques but also initiates the development of a framework to promote and reward the transition to Open Science.

Furthermore, the newsletter also features Open Science blog articles, such as “Why Do We Need Research Assessment?” The article highlights the crucial role of research assessment in promoting transparency and integrity in Open Science. Another blog article, “Methods of Research Assessment,” explores the various methods for evaluating the quality and impact of research.

The newsletter also includes event announcements, such as the upcoming Research Career Progression Survey, which aims to examine researcher career progression and precarity issues. Additionally, the 2nd Researcher Career Summit, taking place on April 20, 2023, will feature key speakers and representatives from research staff associations who will discuss national challenges and impacts on researcher careers.

To stay updated on the latest Open Science news and daily blog updates, readers can follow OPUS Newsletter on Twitter and LinkedIn. With its comprehensive insights and engaging content, the OPUS Newsletter is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the world of Open Science.

International Framework for Open Science
International Framework for Open Science 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open science is the practice of making scientific research and data publicly available to all, without any restrictions. This approach is gaining traction worldwide due to its potential to increase collaboration, transparency, and efficiency in research. However, the lack of a unified approach to open science across nations can create barriers and inconsistencies in its implementation. This is where an international framework for open science can play a significant role in promoting and ensuring consistent practices worldwide.

An international framework for open science would provide guidelines for the dissemination of scientific knowledge, sharing of data, and accessibility of research. This framework would be particularly useful in ensuring the equitable participation of all countries in the scientific enterprise, promoting the sharing of scientific knowledge across borders and providing support for researchers who may not have access to the same resources as their counterparts in more developed countries.

One of the key benefits of an international framework for open science is that it could facilitate the sharing of scientific data, resources, and infrastructure among countries. This could lead to more cost-effective and efficient research, as researchers would not have to spend time and resources duplicating work that has already been done elsewhere. Moreover, this would enable researchers to work collaboratively, regardless of their location, improving the quality and scope of their research.

Another significant benefit of an international framework for open science is that it could help to overcome issues of intellectual property rights and ownership, which can sometimes hinder the sharing of scientific data and resources. The framework could establish clear guidelines on the ownership and usage of data, ensuring that the interests of all stakeholders, including researchers, institutions, and funding agencies, are protected.

An international framework for open science could also address issues related to ethical and legal considerations surrounding the sharing of scientific data. This could involve establishing protocols for the responsible use of data, as well as procedures for ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of individuals who participate in research studies.

While an international framework for open science could be beneficial, it would require the participation and support of governments, research institutions, and funding agencies worldwide. These stakeholders would need to agree on a set of guiding principles and work together to ensure that these principles are implemented consistently across countries and research fields.

Furthermore, to ensure the success of an international framework for open science, it would be essential to educate researchers, policymakers, and the general public about the importance of open science and its potential benefits. This could involve creating training programs and workshops to teach researchers about open science practices and their implementation.

In short, an international framework for open science has the potential to revolutionize the scientific enterprise by promoting collaboration, transparency, and efficiency. However, its implementation would require the cooperation and support of all stakeholders involved in scientific research. If successfully implemented, an international framework for open science could lead to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in science and technology, benefiting societies worldwide.

Discussion on How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science at the MCAA Annual Conference
Discussion on How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science at the MCAA Annual Conference 1024 768 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open science is a movement that promotes transparency, collaboration, and sharing of research data and results. The aim is to make science more accessible and reproducible, which in turn accelerates scientific progress. However, one of the biggest challenges facing open science is the lack of incentives for researchers to engage in open practices. This issue was addressed at the MCAA Annual Conference by representatives of the OPUS project, Gareth O’Neill (Technopolis Group), Clare Viney (Vitae), Brian Cahill (MCAA), and Sebastian Dahle (Eurodoc), in a panel discussion on “How Can We Reward Researchers for Open Science?”

During the session, various questions were discussed, including the precarity of a research career, the obstacles for Research Assessment, and indicators and metrics on how researchers should be rewarded for Open Science. The team members presented the activities of the OPUS project, which is currently developing a set of interventions and metrics for Open Science towards a system that incentivizes and rewards researchers to take up practices of providing open access to research outputs, early and open sharing of research, participation in open peer-review, measures to ensure reproducibility of results, and involving all stakeholders in co-creation.

Insights from the audience during the session

During the session, the audience was asked to participate with feedback on specific questions regarding open science and research assessment. Some results are
presented below.

Some ideas on how researchers can be rewarded for practicing

Financial suppport

The discussion highlighted some ways in which researchers can be rewarded for practicing open science. Financial support is one of them, where funding agencies and research institutions can provide financial incentives to researchers who engage in open science. Institutions could also reward researchers who publish in open-access journals by providing additional funding or recognition. These financial incentives can motivate researchers to embrace open science and make their research more accessible to the wider scientific community.

Academic promotions and awards

Researchers can also be recognized for their contributions to open science through academic promotions and awards. Institutions could create specific awards for researchers who engage in open science, such as the “Open Science Award” or “Open Data Award.” These awards could be given to researchers who have made significant contributions to open science, such as sharing data, developing open-source software, or publishing in open-access journals. Furthermore, institutions could consider open science activities when making academic promotions and tenure decisions.

Collaboration and opportunities for networking

Collaboration and opportunities for networking are also essential rewards for researchers. Open science practices can facilitate collaboration between researchers, as open data and research findings are more accessible to others in the scientific community. Institutions could provide researchers with opportunities to network and collaborate with others who share their open science values. This could be achieved through organized events, such as workshops and conferences, or through online communities, such as social media groups or open science forums.

Public engagement and outreach

Lastly, researchers could be rewarded through increased public engagement and outreach. Open science practices can help to increase the public’s understanding and appreciation of scientific research. Institutions could recognize and reward researchers who engage in open science practices that promote public engagement, such as communicating their research findings to the media or presenting at public events.

What are the next steps and how can OPUS help?

The OPUS project is currently developing a researcher assessment framework together with interventions to support the implementation of the framework at research-performing organizations and research-funding organizations. The framework will provide a comprehensive suite of indicators for these organizations to incentivize and reward their researchers for Open Science. The draft framework will be shared with key stakeholders and the research community for feedback through a public consultation in 2023.

In conclusion, by rewarding researchers for their contributions to open science, we can incentivize more researchers to embrace open science practices, leading to more accessible and reproducible research, and ultimately, scientific progress. The OPUS project is working towards this goal, and it is hoped that the researcher assessment framework developed by the project will help organizations to incentivize and reward their researchers for Open Science practices.

Open Science and Life Expectancy
Open Science and Life Expectancy 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Life expectancy is a measure of the average number of years that a person is expected to live, based on factors such as age, sex, and geographic location. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including genetics, lifestyle, environmental conditions, and access to healthcare. Over the past century, life expectancy has increased dramatically in many parts of the world, thanks to improvements in public health, medical technology, and social and economic development. However, there are still significant disparities in life expectancy between different regions and populations, and many people continue to die prematurely from preventable or treatable diseases.

Open science can play a crucial role in addressing these challenges by facilitating the sharing of scientific knowledge and data. For example, open access publications allow researchers and healthcare professionals from around the world to access the latest research findings, clinical guidelines, and best practices for disease prevention and treatment. This can help to accelerate the development and adoption of effective healthcare interventions, reduce duplication of effort, and improve the overall quality of research and patient care.

In addition, open science can promote collaboration between different stakeholders in the healthcare ecosystem, including researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and patient advocates. By sharing data and insights, these stakeholders can work together to identify the root causes of health disparities and develop evidence-based solutions that address the underlying social, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to poor health outcomes. This approach can help to promote equity and social justice in healthcare, and ensure that everyone has access to the resources and support they need to live healthy, fulfilling lives.

One area where open science has already had a significant impact is in the study of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of open science in enabling rapid and collaborative research on the virus and its transmission, as well as the development and distribution of vaccines and treatments. Open access repositories such as the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) have played a critical role in enabling researchers from around the world to access and share data on the virus, leading to important discoveries and breakthroughs in our understanding of the disease.

Open science has the potential to contribute significantly to improving life expectancy by facilitating the sharing of scientific knowledge and data, promoting collaboration between different stakeholders, and promoting equity and social justice in healthcare. As we continue to face global health challenges such as pandemics, chronic diseases, and health inequalities, it is essential that we embrace open science as a key tool for addressing these challenges and promoting the health and wellbeing of all people, regardless of their background or circumstances.

Research and FinTech: The Intersection of Innovation and Insights
Research and FinTech: The Intersection of Innovation and Insights 1 1 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

FinTech, short for financial technology, has been one of the fastest-growing industries in recent years. With the rise of digitalization, FinTech companies have emerged to provide alternative financial solutions to traditional banking systems. From online payments to peer-to-peer lending, FinTech has revolutionized the way we manage our finances.

However, the success of FinTech companies wouldn’t have been possible without the significant role of research in the industry. Research and FinTech go hand in hand, as innovation and insights are critical to the development and growth of the industry. In this article, we will explore the intersection of research and FinTech and how they complement each other.

FinTech companies are known for their innovative products and services. However, developing innovative solutions requires significant research to understand market trends, consumer preferences, and emerging technologies. Research provides the foundation for innovation in the FinTech industry.

One of the essential components of FinTech is its focus on understanding consumer behavior. FinTech companies must understand the needs and wants of their target market to develop relevant and innovative products and services. This is where research comes in, providing insights into consumer behavior and preferences.

Market research allows FinTech companies to identify gaps in the market and develop solutions that meet the needs of their target market. By analyzing consumer behavior, companies can tailor their products and services to ensure they meet the expectations of their customers. Research can also help identify potential challenges and obstacles in the market, enabling FinTech companies to adapt and evolve their strategies.

Research in FinTech can take many forms, from basic scientific research to applied research focused on developing new products and services. Basic research in fields such as computer science, mathematics, and physics has been instrumental in laying the groundwork for many of the key innovations in FinTech. For example, advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence have enabled the development of predictive analytics and automated trading systems that are revolutionizing the way financial markets operate.

At the same time, applied research is also playing a critical role in the development of FinTech. Companies and organizations around the world are investing heavily in research to develop new products and services that can help them stay competitive in an increasingly crowded marketplace. This research is focused on a wide range of areas, including mobile payments, blockchain technology, and digital currencies.

Important area of research in FinTech is data analysis. The vast amounts of data generated by financial transactions, social media, and other sources provide a wealth of opportunities for researchers to uncover new insights and develop new models for predicting consumer behavior and market trends. This research is helping to drive the development of new products and services that are tailored to the specific needs of consumers and businesses.

The intersection between research and fintech has opened up new possibilities for financial services and has significantly impacted the way we manage our finances. The use of big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence has enabled fintech companies to provide innovative solutions that are more efficient and user-friendly compared to traditional financial institutions. The importance of research cannot be overstated in this field, as it allows fintech companies to constantly evolve and improve their services. Going forward, it is expected that research will continue to play a vital role in the development of fintech, and we can anticipate further advancements that will transform the financial industry in ways we can only imagine.

Methods of Research Assessment
Methods of Research Assessment 1024 681 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Research is an essential aspect of the scientific and academic world. The quality of research is determined by its validity, reliability, and the level of impact it has on society. Hence, it is essential to evaluate research methods and techniques to ensure they meet the required standards. The process of research assessment is critical in providing a basis for decision-making by scholars, funders, and policymakers. Here are some of the methods used to assess research.

Peer Review

Peer review is one of the most common methods of research assessment. It involves the evaluation of a research paper by experts in the same field to ensure that it meets the required standards. Peer review ensures that research is reliable and valid, and also helps to identify gaps and areas of improvement.

Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliometric analysis involves the use of quantitative measures to assess the impact of research publications. This method involves analyzing the number of citations a publication has received, the number of publications by a researcher or institution, and the h-index of a researcher, which is a measure of their productivity and impact.

Altmetrics

Altmetrics are alternative metrics that provide a different view of research impact beyond traditional citations. These metrics capture online attention and engagement with research such as social media mentions, downloads, and views. Altmetrics provide a broader view of research impact and can help to identify research that has a wider societal impact.

Expert Review

Expert review involves the evaluation of research by experts in the field who provide an objective assessment of the quality of research. This method involves evaluating the methodology, results, and conclusions of the research to ensure they meet the required standards.

Impact Assessment

Impact assessment involves evaluating the impact of research on society. This method involves evaluating the extent to which research has influenced policy, practice, or societal outcomes. Impact assessment provides evidence of the value of research to society and can help to inform future research priorities.

Conclusion

Research assessment is an essential process that helps to ensure the quality and impact of research. The methods of research assessment vary, and each has its strengths and weaknesses. However, the combination of these methods can provide a more comprehensive view of research quality and impact. Researchers, funders, and policymakers must continue to use a combination of these methods to ensure that research meets the required standards and has a positive impact on society.

Open Science is Changing Universities
Open Science is Changing Universities 1024 731 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

Open Science is a rapidly growing movement that is transforming the way universities conduct research and share knowledge. The principles of Open Science, which include transparency, collaboration, and accessibility, are becoming increasingly important in today’s academic world. In this article, we will explore how Open Science is changing universities and what this means for the future of research.

One of the most significant ways that Open Science is changing universities is by promoting open access to research findings. Open access means that research articles and data are freely available online for anyone to read, download, and reuse. This approach is in contrast to the traditional publishing model, where research findings are often locked behind paywalls, making it difficult for many people to access them.

Open access is an important part of Open Science because it makes research more accessible and visible to the broader public. This, in turn, can help to increase the impact and relevance of research findings. In addition, open access can also help to address issues of equity and inclusion, ensuring that research is accessible to all, regardless of their financial resources.

Another way that Open Science is changing universities is by promoting collaboration and data sharing. Open Science encourages researchers to share their data, code, and methods with others in the research community. This approach can help to improve the quality and reproducibility of research findings, as other researchers can verify and build upon the work.

Moreover, Open Science can also help to break down disciplinary boundaries and encourage interdisciplinary collaboration. By sharing data and methods, researchers from different fields can work together to solve complex problems and generate new insights. This collaborative approach can lead to more innovative and impactful research.

Open Science is also changing the way universities evaluate and reward research. Traditionally, academic success has been measured by publications in high-impact journals and the acquisition of research grants. However, Open Science encourages a more holistic approach to research evaluation, where the quality and impact of research are assessed based on factors such as open access, data sharing, and collaboration.

This new approach to research evaluation can help to incentivize and reward researchers who engage in Open Science practices. In addition, it can also help to shift the focus from the quantity of publications to the quality and impact of research.

Open Science is a rapidly growing movement that is transforming the way universities conduct research and share knowledge. By promoting open access, collaboration, and data sharing, Open Science is making research more accessible, visible, and impactful. As universities continue to adopt Open Science practices, we can expect to see more innovative and collaborative research that addresses complex global challenges.

Open Science Literature Review
Open Science Literature Review 1024 776 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The team behind the OPUS project examined literature on Open Science. This has been conducted (and will later be updated) as part of state-of-the-art on literature to reform research(er) assessment and incentivize and reward Open Science, to stay up-to-date on research assessment reform and encourage Open Science practices.

Open Science (OS) has emerged as an inclusive movement that aims to make scientific knowledge multilingual, openly available, accessible, and reusable for everyone. The movement also seeks to increase scientific collaborations and sharing of information, and to open the processes of scientific knowledge creation, evaluation, and communication to societal actors beyond the traditional scientific community. To achieve these goals, the research community needs to reform the researcher assessment system and incentivize and reward OS practices. The OPUS project was initiated to address this need, and it has three main components: incentives for OS, metrics and indicators for OS, and pilots to implement and monitor OS.

The first component, incentives for OS, involves a review of the existing literature on researcher assessment and the incentivization of OS practices. The review found that the current assessment system focuses too much on bibliometrics, which involves peer-reviewed publications and citations in top journals. To promote OS, the research community needs a more comprehensive approach that includes research/non-research, open/closed, and quantitative/qualitative dimensions. The literature also suggests several proposals for frameworks, including principles, guidelines, support, and indicators/metrics to reform researcher assessment.

The second component, metrics and indicators for OS, involves the identification of key metrics and indicators that can measure the impact of OS practices. This component is crucial for incentivizing and rewarding OS, as it enables the research community to measure the impact of OS practices and their contribution to the scientific community and society. The OPUS project is currently developing a framework of indicators/metrics for researcher assessment, including OS, to promote the adoption of OS practices in research-performing and research-funding organizations.

The third component, pilots to implement and monitor OS, involves the implementation of the framework developed in the second component in research-performing and research-funding organizations. The pilots will test the effectiveness of the framework and identify any areas that require improvement. The ultimate goal of the pilots is to promote the adoption of OS practices and reform the researcher assessment system to incentivize and reward OS practices.

In conclusion, the OPUS project is a vital initiative that seeks to promote OS practices, reform the researcher assessment system, and incentivize and reward OS practices. The project’s three components, incentives for OS, metrics and indicators for OS, and pilots to implement and monitor OS, provide a comprehensive approach to promoting OS and ensuring its adoption in the research community. Ultimately, the adoption of OS practices will enable the research community to increase scientific collaborations, sharing of information, and open engagement of societal actors, leading to greater trust in science by researchers and the public.

Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Our Privacy Policy can be read here.

Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.