Research

Date: 19 February 2025
Time: 14:00 – 15:00 (CET)
Location: Online

The EU Accessibility Act (EAA), set to take effect on 28 June 2025, introduces regulations designed to enhance accessibility across the EU. Extending beyond existing obligations for public sector bodies, the EAA will require commercial products and services—including books, journals, online content, and library technologies—to be accessible to individuals with disabilities.

To support research libraries in understanding and navigating these changes, the LIBER Copyright & Legal Matters Working Group is hosting a webinar to explore the key aspects of the EAA, its implications for the library sector, and the benefits it offers for fostering inclusivity.

What to Expect

This session will provide:

• An overview of the legal requirements under the EAA.
• Insights into the importance of accessibility in promoting inclusivity.
• Practical guidance on ensuring library content and systems are accessible to all users.

Speakers and Agenda:

• Jennifer Curry Jahnke, Digital Accessibility Manager, University of Birmingham:
  Jennifer will open the session with an overview of the EU Accessibility Act, focusing on its legal impact on research libraries.
• Simon Holt, Senior Product Manager, Content Accessibility, Elsevier:
  Simon will share his professional and personal experience ensuring that books, journals, and multimedia content meet accessibility standards.
• Ted Gies, UX and Accessibility Program Manager, Elsevier:
  Ted will discuss his extensive work in accessibility training, inclusive STEM content, and accessible data visualizations.

Meet the Speakers

• Jennifer Curry Jahnke: An award-winning academic and consultant, Jennifer is a global expert in digital accessibility and a certified member of the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP).
• Simon Holt: A senior accessibility advocate with over 15 years in scholarly publishing, Simon also serves in leadership roles for multiple accessibility-focused organizations.
• Ted Gies: A UX designer and global accessibility expert, Ted has developed training programs and accessibility tools used across STEM fields.

Why Attend?

This webinar offers valuable insights into how research libraries can adapt to the EAA’s requirements and make strides toward inclusivity. Whether you are a library professional, policymaker, or academic leader, this event will equip you with the knowledge and tools to prepare for the upcoming changes.

Register Here

LIBER is committed to fostering inclusive, respectful, and safe environments for collaboration and intellectual dialogue. Participants are expected to abide by the LIBER Code of Conduct.

The CARDEA EU project has marked significant progress in professionalising research management across Europe, launching two major initiatives endorsed by the European Commission: the RM Comp competence framework and the CARDEA Academy. These developments follow the successful submission of Deliverable D7.2, which synthesises insights from interviews with opinion leaders on the evolving role of research managers (RMs).

Launch of the European Competence Framework for Research Managers (RM Comp)

The RM Comp establishes a structured career pathway for RMs, aligning skills development with European standards. Key features include:

• Four-tier career progression (RM1 to RM4), mirroring academic ranks, with senior roles linked to institutional leadership.
• Emphasis on T-shaped competencies: blending transversal skills (e.g., communication, empathy) with technical expertise in areas like ethics, intellectual property, and funding regulations.
• Integration with the “Excellence in Research” award criteria to incentivise institutional adoption.

The framework aims to counter precarity in RM roles by advocating for stable contracts and clearer career trajectories, addressing longstanding issues of undervaluation in academia.

CARDEA Academy: Free Training for Emerging Research Managers

Led by the University of Macerata, the CARDEA Academy offers:

• 17 on-demand modules covering essential RM skills, from grant writing to stakeholder engagement.
• Certification via open badges and micro-credentials upon completion.
• Career development tools, including personalised training needs analyses and organisational development plans.

The Academy’s resources, freely accessible on the CARDEA HUB, target both new entrants and seasoned professionals seeking to align with EU standards.

Key Findings from CARDEA Interviews

Deliverable D7.2, now available on Zenodo, highlights critical insights from seven interviews with RM experts:

Defining the Role of Research Managers

• RMs are “enablers”, not mere supporters, of the research cycle—spanning pre-award planning, post-award implementation, and knowledge valorisation.
• Described as “connectors” and “problem solvers”, they bridge academia, industry, and policymakers1.

Challenges and Solutions

• Visibility and Parity: RMs often face hierarchical biases in academia, with perceived inferiority to researchers. Solutions include:
  • Metrics to quantify RM impact (e.g., grant success rates).
  • Advocacy via EU associations to elevate the profession’s status1.
• Training Gaps: A “360-degree” training path is recommended, incorporating international mobility and sector-specific specialisations.

Policy Recommendations

• Develop a dedicated RM career framework, distinct from researchers, to clarify roles and progression.
• Extend tools like EURAXESS to advertise RM jobs and support cross-border mobility.

Research managers are the backbone of the innovation ecosystem. By professionalising their roles, we ensure that Europe’s research potential is fully realised.The CARDEA project continues to drive systemic change, fostering collaboration between RMs and researchers to strengthen the European Research Area.

The Open Research Community Accelerator (ORCA), with the support of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, has unveiled the Open Scholarship Catalytic Awards Program. This initiative aims to promote a culture of open scholarship, encompassing open science, research, data, and other practices that emphasize transparency, reproducibility, collaboration, and community engagement. Targeted at traditionally under-resourced U.S.-based institutions, the program seeks to foster innovative projects that enhance inclusivity and trust in research outcomes.

Driving Open Scholarship

The Catalytic Awards Program is designed to advance open scholarship through initiatives that accelerate cultural transformation, strengthen institutional capacity, and showcase innovative models for broader adoption. The program supports forward-looking projects that inspire community engagement and inclusivity. Examples of eligible projects include those that develop tools for open data sharing, implement transparent research practices, or create educational programs on open science principles.

Flexible Funding and Support

The program offers funding between $5,000 and $15,000 per project, which must be completed by December 1, 2025. Funds may cover expenses related to capacity-building, networking, and community engagement activities. Additionally, ORCA provides mentorship, project management guidance, and a community of practice model, enabling award recipients to share experiences and learn from one another.

Eligibility and Application Process

The program welcomes applications from students, postdocs, staff, and faculty members at accredited U.S.-based non-R1 and traditionally under-resourced institutions. Eligibility includes federally designated Minority Serving Institutions or institutions with below-median endowment values per student. Applicants must submit a detailed proposal through the ORCA portal, outlining objectives, expected impact, and a budget. Informational webinars on February 5 and March 3, 2025, will guide applicants through the process.

Key application dates:

• Open Date: January 15, 2025
• Deadline: March 15, 2025
• Award Notification: April 15, 2025
• Earliest Start Date: May 15, 2025
• Latest End Date: December 1, 2025

Selection Criteria

The three-round selection process emphasizes equity and transparency:

• Round 1: Internal review for alignment with program objectives and eligibility.
• Round 2: External reviewers evaluate proposals based on clarity, feasibility, community impact, capacity building, and budget justification. Proposals are scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with top-scoring projects prioritized for funding.
• Round 3: A partial lottery system ensures fairness, with priority given to top quartile projects and a lottery for the third quartile.

Policies and Requirements

Key policies include:

• Single proposal submission per round.
• Open licensing compliance to ensure public accessibility of project outputs.
• Participation in monthly engagement activities to foster collaboration.
• Final reporting on project outcomes and impact.
• Acknowledgment of CZI and ORCA support in public outputs.

Supporting Innovation

The Open Scholarship Catalytic Awards Program underscores ORCA’s commitment to advancing open research practices and fostering a more inclusive and collaborative scientific community. By providing resources and mentorship, the program aims to empower institutions and individuals to drive innovation and trust in research.

For more information or inquiries, contact eunice@orcaopen.org.

The European Competence Framework for Researchers outlines essential skills and abilities that researchers must develop to excel in their fields. It encompasses seven key domains, highlighting the multifaceted nature of modern research.

Cognitive Abilities

Researchers are expected to exhibit advanced cognitive skills, including:

• Abstract, critical, analytical, strategic, and systemic thinking to approach complex problems.
• Problem-solving abilities and creativity to innovate and address challenges effectively.

Working with Others

Collaboration is vital in research, with competencies such as:

• Professional interaction, networking, and teamwork.
• Promoting inclusion and diversity, fostering well-being, and building strong mentor-mentee relationships.

Self-Management

Researchers must manage their professional and personal growth by:

• Developing an entrepreneurial spirit and planning effective self-organization.
• Demonstrating resilience and coping with pressure.

Making an Impact

Creating broader societal and academic contributions includes:

• Publishing and disseminating results to the research community.
• Teaching, communicating with the public, and enhancing science’s impact on policy and society.
• Promoting open innovation and knowledge transfer.

Managing Research

Researchers should master organizational and leadership skills like:

• Resource mobilization, project management, and negotiation.
• Evaluating research and encouraging open access publications.

Doing Research

Core research skills include:

• Expertise in disciplinary and interdisciplinary research.
• Writing research documents while adhering to research ethics and principles of integrity.

Managing Research Tools

Finally, researchers must navigate tools and frameworks by:

• Managing research data, intellectual property rights, and promoting citizen science.
• Utilizing open-source software to enhance accessibility and collaboration.

This framework emphasizes the comprehensive skill set required for researchers to thrive, contributing effectively to academia, industry, and society

Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2025
Time: 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM CET
Format: Online

COST Action-funded researchers have a unique opportunity to publish their research outputs on Open Research Europe (ORE), the European Commission’s Open Access publishing platform designed to facilitate transparent and accessible research dissemination.

To help researchers understand the platform and its submission process, the ORE team is hosting an introductory webinar on March 4, 2025. This session will cover the platform’s features, submission guidelines, and benefits for researchers. Attendees will also have the chance to engage directly with the speakers and ask questions about their potential submissions.

Speakers:

• Kelly Woods, Publisher
• Emma Smith, Associate Publisher at F1000
• Lorna Stokes, Digital Communications Officer

This webinar offers an excellent opportunity for COST Action researchers to explore ORE as a valuable tool for enhancing the visibility, transparency, and impact of their work.

Mark your calendar and don’t miss this chance to learn more about Open Research Europe’s publishing opportunities!

The Second Rostock Open Science Workshop, hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR), will take place on March 17–18, 2025 in Rostock, Germany. This two-day event aims to equip demographic researchers with open science tools and practices, fostering knowledge sharing, transparency, and reproducibility in research. Hybrid online participation will be available for those unable to attend in person.

Workshop Highlights

• Key Themes: Enhancing research transparency, making findings accessible to wider audiences, and enabling reproducible research practices.
• Keynote Speakers:
  • Prof. Philip N. Cohen (University of Maryland): “Doing Demography in Public.”
  • Dr. Sondre Solstad (The Economist): “From Open to Impact: Sharing Your Ideas Beyond Academia.”
• Hands-on Training:
  • Practical sessions on reproducible workflows, using R and Stata, and leveraging tools like Git, GitHub, OSF, and Zenodo for sharing data and code.
• Discussions:
  • A roundtable on successes and challenges in implementing open science.
  • A panel exploring the future of open science in demography.
• Expert Instructors:
  • Prof. Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow).
  • Dr. Maarten Buis (University of Konstanz).
  • Dr. Jonas Schöley and Dr. Aliakbar Akbaritabar (MPIDR).

Preliminary Program Overview

• Day 1:
  • Keynote by Prof. Philip N. Cohen.
  • Hands-on sessions on reproducibility (Stata and R).
  • Roundtable discussion on open science implementation.
• Day 2:
  • Training on Git, GitHub, and data-sharing repositories (beginner and advanced sessions).
  • Keynote by Dr. Sondre Solstad.
  • Panel discussion on the future of open science in demography.

Who Should Attend?

The workshop is designed for PhD students, postdocs, and experienced scientists in demography. It is an excellent opportunity for researchers looking to integrate open science practices into their work.

How to Apply

• Deadline: Applications for on-site participation must be submitted by September 30, 2024.
• Requirements: Submit a CV, a 200-word motivation statement, and indicate your preferred software (R or Stata).
• Fees: No tuition fees, but participants must cover travel and living expenses. Limited travel stipends are available for participants from low- and middle-income countries.

Online Participation

Those interested in attending virtually can register via a short survey available here.

The Second Rostock Open Science Workshop offers a unique platform to explore cutting-edge practices in transparency and reproducibility while shaping the future of open science in demography. Don’t miss this opportunity to advance your research and connect with leading experts in the field!

FAIR-IMPACT and FAIRCORE4EOSC are thrilled to invite the European research community to FAIRfest, a unique festival celebrating the advancements of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) solutions within the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). This vibrant event promises insightful discussions, interactive showcases, and a festive atmosphere for all attendees.

Mark Your Calendars

Dates: 20th and 21st February 2025
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands, at Madurodam

FAIRfest coincides with the 19th International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC25), creating a dynamic space for the European research community to engage with an international audience. Together, participants will explore the latest achievements in FAIR solutions:

• F for Findability: Persistent Identifiers & Knowledge Graphs
• A for Accessibility: Semantic Artefacts
• I for Interoperability: From technical to legal interoperability
• R for Reusability: Certification, metrics, and guidelines for FAIR data and software

Register Now

The deadline for in-person registration is 7th February 2025, or earlier if maximum capacity is reached.

A Marketplace of Ideas

FAIRfest is designed as a true festival, complete with a marketplace where adopters and implementers of FAIR-enabling solutions will showcase their tools, methodologies, and best practices. Attendees can engage with interactive stands, coffee tables, and poster areas to learn directly from those who have successfully implemented FAIR techniques.

Highlights include:

• Demonstrations of FAIRCORE4EOSC components
• Real-life stories from research teams supported by the FAIR-IMPACT programme
• Opportunities to meet FAIR Champions, ambassadors, and interoperability experts

Dynamic Programme with Keynotes and Case Studies

The event’s agenda features:

• Plenary Sessions: Provocative standing keynotes to inspire discussions
• Parallel Sessions: Technical case studies and real-world use cases
• Ample time for networking over food, coffee, and tea

The programme balances intellectual engagement with moments for reflection and social connection, ensuring an enjoyable and productive experience.

Explore Madurodam

FAIRfest takes place in the charming setting of Madurodam, a miniature park in the Scheveningen district of The Hague. This unique venue offers 1:25 scale replicas of iconic Dutch landmarks, historical cities, and developments. To make the experience even more memorable, a special dinner will be hosted in this picturesque location.

Don’t miss this opportunity to immerse yourself in the advancements of FAIR solutions and connect with leaders in Open Science.

Register now and join for two inspiring days in The Hague!

A comprehensive international study published in Nature Human Behaviour has found that most people around the world trust scientists and support their involvement in policymaking. The research, conducted across 68 countries with 71,922 respondents, challenges the popular narrative of a widespread crisis of trust in science. Key findings include:

1. Trust in scientists is moderately high globally, with no country showing low overall trust. The grand mean of trust was 3.62 on a 5-point scale, where 3 represents neither high nor low trust.
2. 83% of respondents agree that scientists should communicate about science with the public, particularly in African countries.
3. People generally want scientists to prioritise research on public health and solving energy problems. However, there’s a notable discrepancy between what people perceive science is currently prioritising and what they expect scientists to prioritise.
4. Trust varies across countries and demographic groups:
   • Women, older people, and more educated individuals show higher levels of trust.
   • Urban residents and those with higher incomes tend to trust scientists more.
   • Contrary to some assumptions, religiosity is positively associated with trust in scientists overall, though this varies by country and religion.
5. Political orientation’s relationship with trust in scientists differs significantly between countries:
   • In several European and North American countries, right-leaning and conservative orientations are associated with lower trust.
   • However, in most countries (41 out of 68), there’s no credible evidence of a relationship between political orientation and trust in scientists.
   • In some Eastern European, Southeast Asian, and African countries, right-leaning individuals have higher trust in scientists.
6. Social dominance orientation and science-related populist attitudes are associated with lower trust in scientists.
7. People with high trust in scientists strongly favour scientists’ engagement in society and policymaking, especially in English-speaking countries.

The study also found that while there’s no widespread lack of trust, even small distrusting minorities could impact the consideration of scientific evidence in policymaking. The authors suggest that scientists wishing to gain public trust could work on being more receptive to feedback, more transparent about their funding and data sources, and invest more effort into communicating about science with the public. This large-scale study provides valuable insights for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase public trust in science, emphasising the importance of open communication and addressing public research priorities. It also highlights the need for more international research that includes under-represented countries and understudied subpopulations to better understand the nuances of trust in scientists across different cultural and political contexts.

See more here!

Photo credit: The Oxford Scientist