Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature

Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature 1024 648 Open and Universal Science (OPUS) Project

The retraction of flawed research papers, while essential for scientific integrity, is not enough to prevent the spread of bad science. Retractions have skyrocketed, reaching nearly 14,000 in 2022, yet faulty studies still influence the literature. A key issue is that papers citing retracted work often remain unaddressed, allowing erroneous data to propagate. Despite the growing problem, there is no systematic method for alerting authors when studies they cited are retracted.

To combat this, we need large-scale mechanisms to halt the spread of errors. The academic system, driven by publications and citations, often overlooks dubious work, and unscrupulous practices like paper mills exploit this system. Even reputable publishers may inadvertently contribute by prioritizing volume over quality.

Scientists, publishers, and institutions must work together to maintain the integrity of research. Tools like PubPeer and the Problematic Paper Screener (PPS) can flag suspicious studies, while RetractoBot and the Feet of Clay Detector can identify retracted references. However, these efforts need widespread adoption and integration into editorial processes.

Publishers should take a proactive role by routinely screening manuscripts for plagiarism, doctored data, and unreliable references. They must also improve retraction practices, ensuring retracted articles are clearly marked and regularly checking for overlooked retractions. Additionally, the scientific community should value contributions to correcting the literature, and funders and universities should prioritize solid science over sheer publication numbers.

Ultimately, stopping bad science from spreading requires accountability, preventive measures, and collaboration from all involved to uphold the credibility of scientific research.

Nature 632, 977-979 (2024)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02747-1

Original article via Nature By Guillaume Cabanac

Illustration: Phil Wheeler

Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Our Privacy Policy can be read here.

Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.